deflationmechanism

$BTTC BEWARE: 80% TOKEN BURN CLAIM SEEMS OVERESTIMATED

There’s buzz claiming that 80% of BTTC supply is getting burned, but official sources confirm a ~58% burn of tokens so far. The exaggerated 80% figure lacks transparency and full audit backing. While a massive burn could support scarcity, market behavior still holds the key — burns don’t guarantee price jumps if demand is weak.

📉 Technical Analysis & Trade Setup (BTTC/USDT)

Trend Bias: Neutral to slightly bullish if price stabilizes after the recent burn shock.

Support Zone: Around $0.00000055 – $0.00000060

Resistance Zone: $0.00000068 – $0.00000072

🔹Trade Setup (Long):

Entry: $0.00000060 – $0.00000062

Target 1 (TP): $0.00000068

Target 2 (TP): $0.00000072

Stop Loss (SL): $0.00000052

If price fails to break resistant levels and reverses strongly, a short bias may emerge, but given the burn narrative, a cautious long is favored.

🔍 Market Outlook

The large-scale token burn is bullish from a tokenomics standpoint, but real gains depend on renewed buying interest. If BTTC consolidates above support and volume rebounds, there’s room for upside momentum. However, if the burn hype fades and sellers dominate, price may drift lower toward prior lows.

#BTTC #TokenBurn #CryptoAnalysis #AltcoinTrading #DeflationMechanism
buy and trade here on $BTTC

$Jager 🔥 REAL DIFFERENCE: JAGER BURNS WITH VOLUME — $SafeBSC BURNS WITH MECHANISM

Let’s be direct.

JAGER only burns tokens when there is trading volume.
No volume → no burn.
Volume drops → the burn mechanism slows or stops.
In simple terms, JAGER is fully dependent on market activity and hype.

So the real question is:
What happens when the market cools down?
Who keeps burning tokens for holders then?

Now look at $SafeBSC.

$SafeBSC burns aggressively when volume is high — just like JAGER.
But here’s the critical difference:

👉 When there is NO volume, $SafeBSC still burns.

Why?

Because $SafeBSC doesn’t rely only on transactions.
It uses a bond-based yield mechanism that generates its own profit, independent of trading volume. That profit is then used to buy back tokens and burn them sustainably.

• High volume → strong burns
• Low volume → burns continue
• Bad market → mechanism does not stop

This is the difference between:
❌ a token that survives on trading activity
🔥 a token with a self-running deflation engine

Hype can disappear.
Volume can dry up.
But a real mechanism doesn’t need market permission to operate.

That’s why $SafeBSC is more dangerous in the long term.

If you think JAGER is still stronger — comment why.
Let’s debate it. @safebsctoken
#crypto #memecoin #DeflationMechanism #CryptoReality
$SHIB $PEPE