#johncarl
johncarl
136,667 مشاهدات
84 يقومون بالنقاش
رائج
جديد
China Defies US Sanctions on Oil Refiners With Sweeping Non-Compliance OrderChina has moved to defend its commercial interests in the current trade battle it is waging against the U.S., and the extent of its sanctions against Chinese entities.
On May 2, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) issued a resolution invoking a series of documents collectively referred to as the Blocking Statute to counter the unilateral sanctions imposed by the U.S. government on five local oil refiners.
According to the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), Hengli Petrochemical (Dalian) Refining & Chemical, Shandong Shouguang Luqing Petrochemical, Shandong Jincheng Petrochemical Group, Hebei Xinhai Chemical Group, and Shandong Shengxing Chemical provide “a vital source of revenue to the Iranian regime and its armed forces” by acquiring the majority of Iran’s oil.
Nonetheless, after conducting an assessment, MOFCOM determined that these sanctions constitute “an improper extraterritorial application of foreign laws and measures.”
The institution called to ignore these designations “to safeguard national sovereignty, security, and development interests, and to protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese citizens.”
The application of these measures might put companies operating in both countries “between a rock and a hard place,” according to Henry Gao, Professor at SMU Yong Pung How School of Law, as they will have to comply with U.S. or Chinese regulations and lose one of these large markets.
#Megadrop
#JohnCarl
#Binance
#VANREY
#xmucan
China Defies US Sanctions on Oil Refiners With Sweeping Non-Compliance Order
China has moved to defend its commercial interests in the current trade battle it is waging against the U.S., and the extent of its sanctions against Chinese entities.
On May 2, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) issued a resolution invoking a series of documents collectively referred to as the Blocking Statute to counter the unilateral sanctions imposed by the U.S. government on five local oil refiners.
According to the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), Hengli Petrochemical (Dalian) Refining & Chemical, Shandong Shouguang Luqing Petrochemical, Shandong Jincheng Petrochemical Group, Hebei Xinhai Chemical Group, and Shandong Shengxing Chemical provide “a vital source of revenue to the Iranian regime and its armed forces” by acquiring the majority of Iran’s oil.
Nonetheless, after conducting an assessment, MOFCOM determined that these sanctions constitute “an improper extraterritorial application of foreign laws and measures.”
The institution called to ignore these designations “to safeguard national sovereignty, security, and development interests, and to protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese citizens.”
The application of these measures might put companies operating in both countries “between a rock and a hard place,” according to Henry Gao, Professor at SMU Yong Pung How School of Law, as they will have to comply with U.S. or Chinese regulations and lose one of these large markets.
#Megadrop
#JohnCarl
#Binance
#VANREY
#xmucan
On May 2, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) issued a resolution invoking a series of documents collectively referred to as the Blocking Statute to counter the unilateral sanctions imposed by the U.S. government on five local oil refiners.
According to the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), Hengli Petrochemical (Dalian) Refining & Chemical, Shandong Shouguang Luqing Petrochemical, Shandong Jincheng Petrochemical Group, Hebei Xinhai Chemical Group, and Shandong Shengxing Chemical provide “a vital source of revenue to the Iranian regime and its armed forces” by acquiring the majority of Iran’s oil.
Nonetheless, after conducting an assessment, MOFCOM determined that these sanctions constitute “an improper extraterritorial application of foreign laws and measures.”
The institution called to ignore these designations “to safeguard national sovereignty, security, and development interests, and to protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese citizens.”
The application of these measures might put companies operating in both countries “between a rock and a hard place,” according to Henry Gao, Professor at SMU Yong Pung How School of Law, as they will have to comply with U.S. or Chinese regulations and lose one of these large markets.
#Megadrop
#JohnCarl
#Binance
#VANREY
#xmucan
110
Federal Court Blocks Trump Tariffs; White House AppealsThe U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that Trump exceeded his authority by using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose the tariffs. The court held that IEEPA, typically used for sanctions, does not authorize tariffs and that such power resides solely with Congress.
The Trump administration filed its appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit immediately after the decision. White House spokesperson Kush Desai asserted, “It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency.” Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller denounced the ruling on social media as a “judicial coup,” reflecting the administration’s stance that courts cannot limit presidential emergency actions.
Trump announced the tariffs on April 2, declaring the U.S. trade deficit an “unusual and extraordinary threat” justifying a national emergency. The policy imposed a universal 10% baseline tariff on most imports, plus additional “reciprocal” tariffs ranging from 11% to 50% on approximately 60 targeted nations.
The ruling resulted from lawsuits filed by small businesses, including Oregon-based wine importer V.O.S. Selections, and a coalition of states led by Oregon. They argued the trade deficit did not meet IEEPA’s emergency threshold and that the tariffs unconstitutionally bypassed Congress.
Economists and business groups warned the tariffs would raise consumer prices. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon noted they would contribute to inflationary pressures. Importers faced immediate cost increases, with China facing massive rate hikes, creating market uncertainty and supply chain reassessments. Equities, crypto assets, and precious metal markets have all reacted to Trump’s tariff ideas.
The appeal is now pending before the Federal Circuit. Legal experts anticipate the case may ultimately reach the Supreme Court, given its significant constitutional questions regarding executive power in trade policy. Existing tariffs under separate authority remain unaffected.
#PEPEATH
#OopsieDaisy
#InnovationAhead
#UnicornChannel
#JohnCarl
Federal Court Blocks Trump Tariffs; White House Appeals
The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that Trump exceeded his authority by using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose the tariffs. The court held that IEEPA, typically used for sanctions, does not authorize tariffs and that such power resides solely with Congress.
The Trump administration filed its appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit immediately after the decision. White House spokesperson Kush Desai asserted, “It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency.” Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller denounced the ruling on social media as a “judicial coup,” reflecting the administration’s stance that courts cannot limit presidential emergency actions.
Trump announced the tariffs on April 2, declaring the U.S. trade deficit an “unusual and extraordinary threat” justifying a national emergency. The policy imposed a universal 10% baseline tariff on most imports, plus additional “reciprocal” tariffs ranging from 11% to 50% on approximately 60 targeted nations.
The ruling resulted from lawsuits filed by small businesses, including Oregon-based wine importer V.O.S. Selections, and a coalition of states led by Oregon. They argued the trade deficit did not meet IEEPA’s emergency threshold and that the tariffs unconstitutionally bypassed Congress.
Economists and business groups warned the tariffs would raise consumer prices. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon noted they would contribute to inflationary pressures. Importers faced immediate cost increases, with China facing massive rate hikes, creating market uncertainty and supply chain reassessments. Equities, crypto assets, and precious metal markets have all reacted to Trump’s tariff ideas.
The appeal is now pending before the Federal Circuit. Legal experts anticipate the case may ultimately reach the Supreme Court, given its significant constitutional questions regarding executive power in trade policy. Existing tariffs under separate authority remain unaffected.
#PEPEATH
#OopsieDaisy
#InnovationAhead
#UnicornChannel
#JohnCarl
The Trump administration filed its appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit immediately after the decision. White House spokesperson Kush Desai asserted, “It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency.” Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller denounced the ruling on social media as a “judicial coup,” reflecting the administration’s stance that courts cannot limit presidential emergency actions.
Trump announced the tariffs on April 2, declaring the U.S. trade deficit an “unusual and extraordinary threat” justifying a national emergency. The policy imposed a universal 10% baseline tariff on most imports, plus additional “reciprocal” tariffs ranging from 11% to 50% on approximately 60 targeted nations.
The ruling resulted from lawsuits filed by small businesses, including Oregon-based wine importer V.O.S. Selections, and a coalition of states led by Oregon. They argued the trade deficit did not meet IEEPA’s emergency threshold and that the tariffs unconstitutionally bypassed Congress.
Economists and business groups warned the tariffs would raise consumer prices. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon noted they would contribute to inflationary pressures. Importers faced immediate cost increases, with China facing massive rate hikes, creating market uncertainty and supply chain reassessments. Equities, crypto assets, and precious metal markets have all reacted to Trump’s tariff ideas.
The appeal is now pending before the Federal Circuit. Legal experts anticipate the case may ultimately reach the Supreme Court, given its significant constitutional questions regarding executive power in trade policy. Existing tariffs under separate authority remain unaffected.
#PEPEATH
#OopsieDaisy
#InnovationAhead
#UnicornChannel
#JohnCarl
20
Lyn Alden: The Fed’s New Playbook Is Slow Money, Not Shock TherapyMorshad o kalk debo.ame phn decilm kalk tui bolish ba number ta desh bKash
According to Lyn Alden’s research note published Sunday, the Fed’s move away from long-term balance sheet reduction is less about economic rescue and more about plumbing. Alden explains that liquidity shortages in overnight financing markets forced the Fed to resume reserve management purchases to maintain control over short-term interest rates.
Lyn Alden emphasizes that this is not a return to classic quantitative easing. Instead, the Fed is purchasing shorter-duration Treasury securities to keep bank reserves “ample,” a technical distinction that matters less in practice than it does on paper. As Alden puts it, champagne or sparkling wine, it still comes from the same bottle.
In her analysis, Alden outlines expected monthly purchases starting around $40 billion through tax season, before settling into a baseline of roughly $20 billion to $25 billion per month. Over the course of 2026, that implies balance sheet growth in the $220 billion to $375 billion range—hardly explosive by historical standards
Alden contextualizes those figures by comparing them with prior QE episodes, noting that even a $750 billion expansion would represent only a low single-digit percentage increase relative to today’s $6.5 trillion balance sheet. In her view, “big prints” now require trillion-dollar moves, not incremental adjustments.
Lyn Alden also connects the Fed’s actions to structural trends in bank deposits and fiscal deficits. With U.S. deposits growing by hundreds of billions annually, Alden argues the Fed is effectively forced to expand reserves just to keep pace with the system it oversees.
Beyond the United States, Alden devotes significant attention to Japan’s rising bond yields. While social media chatter points to imminent disaster, Lyn Alden pushes back, explaining that Japan’s central bank ownership of government bonds limits systemic risk, even as yields climb.
Still, Alden warns that Japan faces an uncomfortable trade-off between higher interest costs and currency weakness. Yield curve control, she notes, can cap borrowing costs but risks further yen depreciation—an issue made more sensitive by energy prices and household inflation.
From an asset allocation standpoint, Lyn Alden frames the “gradual print” as mildly supportive for scarce assets and mildly negative for the dollar. That backdrop, she argues, helps explain continued interest in gold and bitcoin, even without headline-grabbing stimulus announcements.
Alden cautions, however, that not all scarcity trades offer the same asymmetry they once did. Precious metals, she notes, have largely repriced from undervalued to more fairly valued, making disciplined rebalancing more important than momentum chasing.
Ultimately, Lyn Alden’s research suggests that the era of dramatic policy shocks has given way to quieter, structural liquidity management. For investors, she argues, the takeaway is less about timing a “big print” and more about understanding why steady expansion has become the system’s default setting.
#ADPPayrollsSurge
#IranDealHormuzOpen
#JohnCarl
#XRPRealityCheck
#MbeyaconsciousComunity
Lyn Alden: The Fed’s New Playbook Is Slow Money, Not Shock Therapy
Morshad o kalk debo.ame phn decilm kalk tui bolish ba number ta desh bKash
According to Lyn Alden’s research note published Sunday, the Fed’s move away from long-term balance sheet reduction is less about economic rescue and more about plumbing. Alden explains that liquidity shortages in overnight financing markets forced the Fed to resume reserve management purchases to maintain control over short-term interest rates.
Lyn Alden emphasizes that this is not a return to classic quantitative easing. Instead, the Fed is purchasing shorter-duration Treasury securities to keep bank reserves “ample,” a technical distinction that matters less in practice than it does on paper. As Alden puts it, champagne or sparkling wine, it still comes from the same bottle.
In her analysis, Alden outlines expected monthly purchases starting around $40 billion through tax season, before settling into a baseline of roughly $20 billion to $25 billion per month. Over the course of 2026, that implies balance sheet growth in the $220 billion to $375 billion range—hardly explosive by historical standards
Alden contextualizes those figures by comparing them with prior QE episodes, noting that even a $750 billion expansion would represent only a low single-digit percentage increase relative to today’s $6.5 trillion balance sheet. In her view, “big prints” now require trillion-dollar moves, not incremental adjustments.
Lyn Alden also connects the Fed’s actions to structural trends in bank deposits and fiscal deficits. With U.S. deposits growing by hundreds of billions annually, Alden argues the Fed is effectively forced to expand reserves just to keep pace with the system it oversees.
Beyond the United States, Alden devotes significant attention to Japan’s rising bond yields. While social media chatter points to imminent disaster, Lyn Alden pushes back, explaining that Japan’s central bank ownership of government bonds limits systemic risk, even as yields climb.
Still, Alden warns that Japan faces an uncomfortable trade-off between higher interest costs and currency weakness. Yield curve control, she notes, can cap borrowing costs but risks further yen depreciation—an issue made more sensitive by energy prices and household inflation.
From an asset allocation standpoint, Lyn Alden frames the “gradual print” as mildly supportive for scarce assets and mildly negative for the dollar. That backdrop, she argues, helps explain continued interest in gold and bitcoin, even without headline-grabbing stimulus announcements.
Alden cautions, however, that not all scarcity trades offer the same asymmetry they once did. Precious metals, she notes, have largely repriced from undervalued to more fairly valued, making disciplined rebalancing more important than momentum chasing.
Ultimately, Lyn Alden’s research suggests that the era of dramatic policy shocks has given way to quieter, structural liquidity management. For investors, she argues, the takeaway is less about timing a “big print” and more about understanding why steady expansion has become the system’s default setting.
#ADPPayrollsSurge
#IranDealHormuzOpen
#JohnCarl
#XRPRealityCheck
#MbeyaconsciousComunity
According to Lyn Alden’s research note published Sunday, the Fed’s move away from long-term balance sheet reduction is less about economic rescue and more about plumbing. Alden explains that liquidity shortages in overnight financing markets forced the Fed to resume reserve management purchases to maintain control over short-term interest rates.
Lyn Alden emphasizes that this is not a return to classic quantitative easing. Instead, the Fed is purchasing shorter-duration Treasury securities to keep bank reserves “ample,” a technical distinction that matters less in practice than it does on paper. As Alden puts it, champagne or sparkling wine, it still comes from the same bottle.
In her analysis, Alden outlines expected monthly purchases starting around $40 billion through tax season, before settling into a baseline of roughly $20 billion to $25 billion per month. Over the course of 2026, that implies balance sheet growth in the $220 billion to $375 billion range—hardly explosive by historical standards
Alden contextualizes those figures by comparing them with prior QE episodes, noting that even a $750 billion expansion would represent only a low single-digit percentage increase relative to today’s $6.5 trillion balance sheet. In her view, “big prints” now require trillion-dollar moves, not incremental adjustments.
Lyn Alden also connects the Fed’s actions to structural trends in bank deposits and fiscal deficits. With U.S. deposits growing by hundreds of billions annually, Alden argues the Fed is effectively forced to expand reserves just to keep pace with the system it oversees.
Beyond the United States, Alden devotes significant attention to Japan’s rising bond yields. While social media chatter points to imminent disaster, Lyn Alden pushes back, explaining that Japan’s central bank ownership of government bonds limits systemic risk, even as yields climb.
Still, Alden warns that Japan faces an uncomfortable trade-off between higher interest costs and currency weakness. Yield curve control, she notes, can cap borrowing costs but risks further yen depreciation—an issue made more sensitive by energy prices and household inflation.
From an asset allocation standpoint, Lyn Alden frames the “gradual print” as mildly supportive for scarce assets and mildly negative for the dollar. That backdrop, she argues, helps explain continued interest in gold and bitcoin, even without headline-grabbing stimulus announcements.
Alden cautions, however, that not all scarcity trades offer the same asymmetry they once did. Precious metals, she notes, have largely repriced from undervalued to more fairly valued, making disciplined rebalancing more important than momentum chasing.
Ultimately, Lyn Alden’s research suggests that the era of dramatic policy shocks has given way to quieter, structural liquidity management. For investors, she argues, the takeaway is less about timing a “big print” and more about understanding why steady expansion has become the system’s default setting.
#ADPPayrollsSurge
#IranDealHormuzOpen
#JohnCarl
#XRPRealityCheck
#MbeyaconsciousComunity
365
Robert Kiyosaki Says Buy Bitcoin as Yen Carry Trade Forces Bubble PanicRobert Kiyosaki, author of the best-selling book Rich Dad Poor Dad, has once again reiterated his warnings about mounting global financial risks. His book has remained a perennial best seller for more than two decades, translated into dozens of languages and selling millions of copies worldwide, establishing him as one of the most influential voices in personal finance.
Kiyosaki shared on the social media platform X on Nov. 28: “Japan ‘Carry Trade’ ended. Watch out below. Bubble Markets about to deflate.” Reinforcing his long-held investment stance, he stressed:
He concluded with one of his strongest assertions: “Yes, you can get richer while the world gets poorer.”
The renowned author’s warning arrives as analysts report that Japan’s massive yen carry trade—estimated at roughly $20 trillion—is beginning to unwind. For decades, global investors borrowed cheaply in yen to chase higher-yielding assets, inflating valuations across equities, tech stocks, and emerging markets. But with the yen strengthening and Japanese bond yields rising sharply in November 2025, the forced unwinding of these positions has begun. This raises the risk of a global liquidity crunch as investors rush to repay yen-denominated debt, a dynamic that has historically intensified market selloffs, including during the 2008 financial crisis.
The famous author’s recommendation to buy gold, silver, bitcoin, and ethereum reflects his view that traditional markets are entering a dangerous phase. He has consistently promoted these assets as hedges against what he calls the “biggest crash in history.” He describes gold and silver as enduring forms of real money and sees bitcoin and ethereum as scarce, decentralized assets that can preserve wealth as the U.S. dollar and other fiat currencies weaken. He often characterizes major downturns as wealth-transfer events in which holders of hard or digital sound money can fare better, reinforcing his long-term support for both cryptocurrencies.
Still, the famous author remains unwavering. His long-held view of bitcoin as “the people’s money,” his repeated warnings about fiat debasement, and his belief that the U.S. economy is on a deteriorating trajectory all support his latest message: prepare for turmoil and position yourself in the assets he believes will endure the collapse he continues to predict.
#Launchpool
#MegadropLista
#NOTCOİN
#xmucanX
#JohnCarl
Robert Kiyosaki Says Buy Bitcoin as Yen Carry Trade Forces Bubble Panic
Robert Kiyosaki, author of the best-selling book Rich Dad Poor Dad, has once again reiterated his warnings about mounting global financial risks. His book has remained a perennial best seller for more than two decades, translated into dozens of languages and selling millions of copies worldwide, establishing him as one of the most influential voices in personal finance.
Kiyosaki shared on the social media platform X on Nov. 28: “Japan ‘Carry Trade’ ended. Watch out below. Bubble Markets about to deflate.” Reinforcing his long-held investment stance, he stressed:
He concluded with one of his strongest assertions: “Yes, you can get richer while the world gets poorer.”
The renowned author’s warning arrives as analysts report that Japan’s massive yen carry trade—estimated at roughly $20 trillion—is beginning to unwind. For decades, global investors borrowed cheaply in yen to chase higher-yielding assets, inflating valuations across equities, tech stocks, and emerging markets. But with the yen strengthening and Japanese bond yields rising sharply in November 2025, the forced unwinding of these positions has begun. This raises the risk of a global liquidity crunch as investors rush to repay yen-denominated debt, a dynamic that has historically intensified market selloffs, including during the 2008 financial crisis.
The famous author’s recommendation to buy gold, silver, bitcoin, and ethereum reflects his view that traditional markets are entering a dangerous phase. He has consistently promoted these assets as hedges against what he calls the “biggest crash in history.” He describes gold and silver as enduring forms of real money and sees bitcoin and ethereum as scarce, decentralized assets that can preserve wealth as the U.S. dollar and other fiat currencies weaken. He often characterizes major downturns as wealth-transfer events in which holders of hard or digital sound money can fare better, reinforcing his long-term support for both cryptocurrencies.
Still, the famous author remains unwavering. His long-held view of bitcoin as “the people’s money,” his repeated warnings about fiat debasement, and his belief that the U.S. economy is on a deteriorating trajectory all support his latest message: prepare for turmoil and position yourself in the assets he believes will endure the collapse he continues to predict.
#Launchpool
#MegadropLista
#NOTCOİN
#xmucanX
#JohnCarl
Kiyosaki shared on the social media platform X on Nov. 28: “Japan ‘Carry Trade’ ended. Watch out below. Bubble Markets about to deflate.” Reinforcing his long-held investment stance, he stressed:
He concluded with one of his strongest assertions: “Yes, you can get richer while the world gets poorer.”
The renowned author’s warning arrives as analysts report that Japan’s massive yen carry trade—estimated at roughly $20 trillion—is beginning to unwind. For decades, global investors borrowed cheaply in yen to chase higher-yielding assets, inflating valuations across equities, tech stocks, and emerging markets. But with the yen strengthening and Japanese bond yields rising sharply in November 2025, the forced unwinding of these positions has begun. This raises the risk of a global liquidity crunch as investors rush to repay yen-denominated debt, a dynamic that has historically intensified market selloffs, including during the 2008 financial crisis.
The famous author’s recommendation to buy gold, silver, bitcoin, and ethereum reflects his view that traditional markets are entering a dangerous phase. He has consistently promoted these assets as hedges against what he calls the “biggest crash in history.” He describes gold and silver as enduring forms of real money and sees bitcoin and ethereum as scarce, decentralized assets that can preserve wealth as the U.S. dollar and other fiat currencies weaken. He often characterizes major downturns as wealth-transfer events in which holders of hard or digital sound money can fare better, reinforcing his long-term support for both cryptocurrencies.
Still, the famous author remains unwavering. His long-held view of bitcoin as “the people’s money,” his repeated warnings about fiat debasement, and his belief that the U.S. economy is on a deteriorating trajectory all support his latest message: prepare for turmoil and position yourself in the assets he believes will endure the collapse he continues to predict.
#Launchpool
#MegadropLista
#NOTCOİN
#xmucanX
#JohnCarl
21
Trading Bitcoin With Elliott Wave Theory: Patterns and PsychologyHaving explored foundational tools like oscillators, moving averages, and Fibonacci retracement, it’s time to delve into Elliott Wave Theory for analyzing bitcoin prices. This advanced technical analysis method focuses on identifying recurring price patterns, or “waves,” driven by market psychology. Understanding Elliott Wave offers a unique lens to anticipate bitcoin’s volatile cycles and potential trend reversals by mapping its distinct impulse and corrective wave structures.
Elliott Wave Theory, developed by accountant Ralph Nelson Elliott in the 1930s, is a technical analysis method based on the observation that crowd psychology drives financial markets in predictable, repetitive cycles. Forced into retirement by illness, Elliott meticulously studied decades of stock market data and concluded that prices move in distinct, fractal patterns reflecting swings between optimism and pessimism. He detailed his findings in “The Wave Principle” published in 1938.
The theory identifies two primary wave types. Impulse (or motive) waves consist of five sub-waves (labeled 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) and move in the direction of the main trend. Within this structure, waves 1, 3, and 5 advance the trend, while waves 2 and 4 represent smaller pullbacks.
Corrective waves consist of three sub-waves (labeled A, B, C) and move against the main trend, acting as interruptions. A core tenet is the fractal nature of these patterns. This means the same basic wave structures – five waves up followed by three waves down in a bull market, or vice versa in a bear market – repeat across all timeframes, from minute charts to multi-decade charts.
Analysts also frequently observe relationships between wave lengths adhering to Fibonacci ratios (like 38%, 50%, or 62% retracements). Bitcoin’s well-documented volatility and cyclical price movements make it a frequent subject for Elliott Wave analysis. Traders apply the theory to identify potential trend direction, continuation points, and reversals within the cryptocurrency’s price charts.
Applying Elliott Wave Theory to bitcoin (BTC) trading follows a structured process. First, traders identify the primary trend – whether bitcoin is in a bullish (uptrend) or bearish (downtrend) phase. This sets the context for labeling the waves.
Next comes the crucial step of labeling the waves according to their position and characteristics. In an uptrend, traders look for a developing five-wave impulse pattern upwards (1-2-3-4-5), expected to be followed by a three-wave corrective pattern downwards (A-B-C). The reverse applies in a downtrend.
Bitcoin traders use this wave identification to spot potential entry and exit points. Common strategies include looking for entry opportunities during the pullbacks of Wave 2 or Wave 4 within an uptrend impulse pattern, aiming to capitalize on the anticipated strong moves of Wave 3 or Wave 5. Traders often consider exiting long positions as Wave 5 matures or when the corrective A-B-C pattern begins. Conversely, corrective waves (A-B-C) signal caution for trend-following positions.
Analysis typically involves examining multiple timeframes. A five-wave impulse pattern visible on a weekly bitcoin chart might contain smaller, complete five-wave patterns within it on daily or hourly charts. This multi-scale analysis helps traders align their strategies with different time horizons.
Key rules help maintain consistency in wave counting: Wave 2 cannot retrace more than 100% of Wave 1; Wave 3 cannot be the shortest among waves 1, 3, and 5; and Wave 4 must not overlap with the price territory of Wave 1. Violation of these core rules invalidates the wave count.
However, applying Elliott Wave Theory effectively requires significant practice. The interpretation can be subjective, leading different analysts to see different wave counts on the same bitcoin chart. Its probabilistic nature, rather than deterministic, means it suggests possibilities, not certainties.
Therefore, Bitcoin traders are generally advised to use Elliott Wave analysis in conjunction with other technical indicators – such as moving averages, oscillators like the relative strength index ( RSI), or volume analysis – for confirmation of signals and improved decision-making. It provides a framework for understanding market structure and psychology, but its application demands skill and disciplined risk management, especially in the fast-moving crypto markets.
As mentioned earlier, one of the inherent problems with Elliott Wave Theory lies in its deeply subjective nature—pinpointing where one wave concludes and another begins is often a matter of interpretation rather than empirical precision. Given that financial markets don’t arrive conveniently labeled, traders are left to lean on pattern recognition, contextual inference, and individual discretion when counting waves—a process that frequently spawns contention, even among seasoned analysts, with some critics dismissing the entire theory as little more than financial fortune-telling.
#FactCheck
#TrendingTopic
#YapayzekaAI
#Uniswap’s
#JohnCarl
Trading Bitcoin With Elliott Wave Theory: Patterns and Psychology
Having explored foundational tools like oscillators, moving averages, and Fibonacci retracement, it’s time to delve into Elliott Wave Theory for analyzing bitcoin prices. This advanced technical analysis method focuses on identifying recurring price patterns, or “waves,” driven by market psychology. Understanding Elliott Wave offers a unique lens to anticipate bitcoin’s volatile cycles and potential trend reversals by mapping its distinct impulse and corrective wave structures.
Elliott Wave Theory, developed by accountant Ralph Nelson Elliott in the 1930s, is a technical analysis method based on the observation that crowd psychology drives financial markets in predictable, repetitive cycles. Forced into retirement by illness, Elliott meticulously studied decades of stock market data and concluded that prices move in distinct, fractal patterns reflecting swings between optimism and pessimism. He detailed his findings in “The Wave Principle” published in 1938.
The theory identifies two primary wave types. Impulse (or motive) waves consist of five sub-waves (labeled 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) and move in the direction of the main trend. Within this structure, waves 1, 3, and 5 advance the trend, while waves 2 and 4 represent smaller pullbacks.
Corrective waves consist of three sub-waves (labeled A, B, C) and move against the main trend, acting as interruptions. A core tenet is the fractal nature of these patterns. This means the same basic wave structures – five waves up followed by three waves down in a bull market, or vice versa in a bear market – repeat across all timeframes, from minute charts to multi-decade charts.
Analysts also frequently observe relationships between wave lengths adhering to Fibonacci ratios (like 38%, 50%, or 62% retracements). Bitcoin’s well-documented volatility and cyclical price movements make it a frequent subject for Elliott Wave analysis. Traders apply the theory to identify potential trend direction, continuation points, and reversals within the cryptocurrency’s price charts.
Applying Elliott Wave Theory to bitcoin (BTC) trading follows a structured process. First, traders identify the primary trend – whether bitcoin is in a bullish (uptrend) or bearish (downtrend) phase. This sets the context for labeling the waves.
Next comes the crucial step of labeling the waves according to their position and characteristics. In an uptrend, traders look for a developing five-wave impulse pattern upwards (1-2-3-4-5), expected to be followed by a three-wave corrective pattern downwards (A-B-C). The reverse applies in a downtrend.
Bitcoin traders use this wave identification to spot potential entry and exit points. Common strategies include looking for entry opportunities during the pullbacks of Wave 2 or Wave 4 within an uptrend impulse pattern, aiming to capitalize on the anticipated strong moves of Wave 3 or Wave 5. Traders often consider exiting long positions as Wave 5 matures or when the corrective A-B-C pattern begins. Conversely, corrective waves (A-B-C) signal caution for trend-following positions.
Analysis typically involves examining multiple timeframes. A five-wave impulse pattern visible on a weekly bitcoin chart might contain smaller, complete five-wave patterns within it on daily or hourly charts. This multi-scale analysis helps traders align their strategies with different time horizons.
Key rules help maintain consistency in wave counting: Wave 2 cannot retrace more than 100% of Wave 1; Wave 3 cannot be the shortest among waves 1, 3, and 5; and Wave 4 must not overlap with the price territory of Wave 1. Violation of these core rules invalidates the wave count.
However, applying Elliott Wave Theory effectively requires significant practice. The interpretation can be subjective, leading different analysts to see different wave counts on the same bitcoin chart. Its probabilistic nature, rather than deterministic, means it suggests possibilities, not certainties.
Therefore, Bitcoin traders are generally advised to use Elliott Wave analysis in conjunction with other technical indicators – such as moving averages, oscillators like the relative strength index ( RSI), or volume analysis – for confirmation of signals and improved decision-making. It provides a framework for understanding market structure and psychology, but its application demands skill and disciplined risk management, especially in the fast-moving crypto markets.
As mentioned earlier, one of the inherent problems with Elliott Wave Theory lies in its deeply subjective nature—pinpointing where one wave concludes and another begins is often a matter of interpretation rather than empirical precision. Given that financial markets don’t arrive conveniently labeled, traders are left to lean on pattern recognition, contextual inference, and individual discretion when counting waves—a process that frequently spawns contention, even among seasoned analysts, with some critics dismissing the entire theory as little more than financial fortune-telling.
#FactCheck
#TrendingTopic
#YapayzekaAI
#Uniswap’s
#JohnCarl
Elliott Wave Theory, developed by accountant Ralph Nelson Elliott in the 1930s, is a technical analysis method based on the observation that crowd psychology drives financial markets in predictable, repetitive cycles. Forced into retirement by illness, Elliott meticulously studied decades of stock market data and concluded that prices move in distinct, fractal patterns reflecting swings between optimism and pessimism. He detailed his findings in “The Wave Principle” published in 1938.
The theory identifies two primary wave types. Impulse (or motive) waves consist of five sub-waves (labeled 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) and move in the direction of the main trend. Within this structure, waves 1, 3, and 5 advance the trend, while waves 2 and 4 represent smaller pullbacks.
Corrective waves consist of three sub-waves (labeled A, B, C) and move against the main trend, acting as interruptions. A core tenet is the fractal nature of these patterns. This means the same basic wave structures – five waves up followed by three waves down in a bull market, or vice versa in a bear market – repeat across all timeframes, from minute charts to multi-decade charts.
Analysts also frequently observe relationships between wave lengths adhering to Fibonacci ratios (like 38%, 50%, or 62% retracements). Bitcoin’s well-documented volatility and cyclical price movements make it a frequent subject for Elliott Wave analysis. Traders apply the theory to identify potential trend direction, continuation points, and reversals within the cryptocurrency’s price charts.
Applying Elliott Wave Theory to bitcoin (BTC) trading follows a structured process. First, traders identify the primary trend – whether bitcoin is in a bullish (uptrend) or bearish (downtrend) phase. This sets the context for labeling the waves.
Next comes the crucial step of labeling the waves according to their position and characteristics. In an uptrend, traders look for a developing five-wave impulse pattern upwards (1-2-3-4-5), expected to be followed by a three-wave corrective pattern downwards (A-B-C). The reverse applies in a downtrend.
Bitcoin traders use this wave identification to spot potential entry and exit points. Common strategies include looking for entry opportunities during the pullbacks of Wave 2 or Wave 4 within an uptrend impulse pattern, aiming to capitalize on the anticipated strong moves of Wave 3 or Wave 5. Traders often consider exiting long positions as Wave 5 matures or when the corrective A-B-C pattern begins. Conversely, corrective waves (A-B-C) signal caution for trend-following positions.
Analysis typically involves examining multiple timeframes. A five-wave impulse pattern visible on a weekly bitcoin chart might contain smaller, complete five-wave patterns within it on daily or hourly charts. This multi-scale analysis helps traders align their strategies with different time horizons.
Key rules help maintain consistency in wave counting: Wave 2 cannot retrace more than 100% of Wave 1; Wave 3 cannot be the shortest among waves 1, 3, and 5; and Wave 4 must not overlap with the price territory of Wave 1. Violation of these core rules invalidates the wave count.
However, applying Elliott Wave Theory effectively requires significant practice. The interpretation can be subjective, leading different analysts to see different wave counts on the same bitcoin chart. Its probabilistic nature, rather than deterministic, means it suggests possibilities, not certainties.
Therefore, Bitcoin traders are generally advised to use Elliott Wave analysis in conjunction with other technical indicators – such as moving averages, oscillators like the relative strength index ( RSI), or volume analysis – for confirmation of signals and improved decision-making. It provides a framework for understanding market structure and psychology, but its application demands skill and disciplined risk management, especially in the fast-moving crypto markets.
As mentioned earlier, one of the inherent problems with Elliott Wave Theory lies in its deeply subjective nature—pinpointing where one wave concludes and another begins is often a matter of interpretation rather than empirical precision. Given that financial markets don’t arrive conveniently labeled, traders are left to lean on pattern recognition, contextual inference, and individual discretion when counting waves—a process that frequently spawns contention, even among seasoned analysts, with some critics dismissing the entire theory as little more than financial fortune-telling.
#FactCheck
#TrendingTopic
#YapayzekaAI
#Uniswap’s
#JohnCarl
15
Bitcoin Traders Dump $1,500 in 1 Hour as Price Hits $76,567, Losses DeepenHours after reclaiming the $79,000 threshold, bitcoin tumbled well below $77,000 as the earlier enthusiasm sparked by reports that Iran had submitted a peace plan to end the Middle East war permanently dissipated. In fact, Bitstamp data show that bitcoin experienced two sharp price drops on April 27, first shortly after it tapped an intraday high of $79,490 around midnight.
After appearing to consolidate below $77,800, the top cryptocurrency briefly topped $78,000 before a sell-off saw it shed approximately $1,500 in under one hour to reach a session low of $76,567. Subsequent attempts to reverse the losses stalled shortly after it breezed past $77,000; at the time of writing, the cryptocurrency traded around $76,700.
With this price action, bitcoin’s 24-hour losses mounted, reaching 1.7%, which helped drag down its market capitalization from around $1.56 trillion observed in the early morning session to $1.54 trillion at 12:45 p.m. EDT.
While bitcoin has spent much of the last few weeks in a tight correlation with global risk assets, Monday’s slide marked a notable decoupling. The cryptocurrency’s decline appeared little more aggressive than the action in European and U.S. equities, which remained largely range-bound and flat.
This downward pressure on the top cryptocurrency stood in stark contrast to the bullish momentum in the Asia-Pacific region. Leading the charge, South Korea’s Kospi index surged to a historic milestone, breaching the 6,600 level for the first time in its history. This regional rally was not entirely uniform, however; Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index emerged as a minor outlier, paring gains to close with a marginal 0.2% retreat.
Asian stocks surged alongside bitcoin following reports that Iran submitted a proposal to the Trump administration. However, Western commentators noted that the offer avoids the critical nuclear issue. Although the administration is reportedly reviewing the document, analysts argue that because the conflict originated from disagreements over Iran’s nuclear enrichment, Washington is unlikely to accept the current terms.
Still, with Brent Crude oil prices climbing back above $100 per barrel, some observers suggest the administration may be incentivized to negotiate to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Restoring access to the strait could drive oil prices below $90, providing consumer relief and tempering global recession fears.
Meanwhile, bitcoin’s continued slide on Monday saw $110 million in long bets get liquidated, versus $59 million in shorts. Overall, the crypto economy saw $454 million in leveraged positions wiped out, with long bets accounting for $284 million of the total.
#tobechukwu
#haroonahmadofficial
#Robertkiyosaki
#JohnCarl
Bitcoin Traders Dump $1,500 in 1 Hour as Price Hits $76,567, Losses Deepen
Hours after reclaiming the $79,000 threshold, bitcoin tumbled well below $77,000 as the earlier enthusiasm sparked by reports that Iran had submitted a peace plan to end the Middle East war permanently dissipated. In fact, Bitstamp data show that bitcoin experienced two sharp price drops on April 27, first shortly after it tapped an intraday high of $79,490 around midnight.
After appearing to consolidate below $77,800, the top cryptocurrency briefly topped $78,000 before a sell-off saw it shed approximately $1,500 in under one hour to reach a session low of $76,567. Subsequent attempts to reverse the losses stalled shortly after it breezed past $77,000; at the time of writing, the cryptocurrency traded around $76,700.
With this price action, bitcoin’s 24-hour losses mounted, reaching 1.7%, which helped drag down its market capitalization from around $1.56 trillion observed in the early morning session to $1.54 trillion at 12:45 p.m. EDT.
While bitcoin has spent much of the last few weeks in a tight correlation with global risk assets, Monday’s slide marked a notable decoupling. The cryptocurrency’s decline appeared little more aggressive than the action in European and U.S. equities, which remained largely range-bound and flat.
This downward pressure on the top cryptocurrency stood in stark contrast to the bullish momentum in the Asia-Pacific region. Leading the charge, South Korea’s Kospi index surged to a historic milestone, breaching the 6,600 level for the first time in its history. This regional rally was not entirely uniform, however; Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index emerged as a minor outlier, paring gains to close with a marginal 0.2% retreat.
Asian stocks surged alongside bitcoin following reports that Iran submitted a proposal to the Trump administration. However, Western commentators noted that the offer avoids the critical nuclear issue. Although the administration is reportedly reviewing the document, analysts argue that because the conflict originated from disagreements over Iran’s nuclear enrichment, Washington is unlikely to accept the current terms.
Still, with Brent Crude oil prices climbing back above $100 per barrel, some observers suggest the administration may be incentivized to negotiate to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Restoring access to the strait could drive oil prices below $90, providing consumer relief and tempering global recession fears.
Meanwhile, bitcoin’s continued slide on Monday saw $110 million in long bets get liquidated, versus $59 million in shorts. Overall, the crypto economy saw $454 million in leveraged positions wiped out, with long bets accounting for $284 million of the total.
#tobechukwu
#haroonahmadofficial
#Robertkiyosaki
#JohnCarl
After appearing to consolidate below $77,800, the top cryptocurrency briefly topped $78,000 before a sell-off saw it shed approximately $1,500 in under one hour to reach a session low of $76,567. Subsequent attempts to reverse the losses stalled shortly after it breezed past $77,000; at the time of writing, the cryptocurrency traded around $76,700.
With this price action, bitcoin’s 24-hour losses mounted, reaching 1.7%, which helped drag down its market capitalization from around $1.56 trillion observed in the early morning session to $1.54 trillion at 12:45 p.m. EDT.
While bitcoin has spent much of the last few weeks in a tight correlation with global risk assets, Monday’s slide marked a notable decoupling. The cryptocurrency’s decline appeared little more aggressive than the action in European and U.S. equities, which remained largely range-bound and flat.
This downward pressure on the top cryptocurrency stood in stark contrast to the bullish momentum in the Asia-Pacific region. Leading the charge, South Korea’s Kospi index surged to a historic milestone, breaching the 6,600 level for the first time in its history. This regional rally was not entirely uniform, however; Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index emerged as a minor outlier, paring gains to close with a marginal 0.2% retreat.
Asian stocks surged alongside bitcoin following reports that Iran submitted a proposal to the Trump administration. However, Western commentators noted that the offer avoids the critical nuclear issue. Although the administration is reportedly reviewing the document, analysts argue that because the conflict originated from disagreements over Iran’s nuclear enrichment, Washington is unlikely to accept the current terms.
Still, with Brent Crude oil prices climbing back above $100 per barrel, some observers suggest the administration may be incentivized to negotiate to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Restoring access to the strait could drive oil prices below $90, providing consumer relief and tempering global recession fears.
Meanwhile, bitcoin’s continued slide on Monday saw $110 million in long bets get liquidated, versus $59 million in shorts. Overall, the crypto economy saw $454 million in leveraged positions wiped out, with long bets accounting for $284 million of the total.
#tobechukwu
#haroonahmadofficial
#Robertkiyosaki
#JohnCarl
27
Paul Tudor Jones calls bitcoin the 'best inflation hedge,' warns of overvalued stocksIt will be "really hard to make money" in stocks over the next decade, said the billionaire investor, noting that the S&P 500's valuation reminds him of the 2000 dot-com bubble.
Jones framed bitcoin’s appeal through the lens of past market cycles. During periods of aggressive monetary and fiscal stimulus, such as after the March 2020 pandemic crash, he said inflation trades tend to emerge as central banks inject liquidity into the system.
When you saw all the interventions… you just knew that the inflation trades were going to take off," he said, adding that bitcoin was the most compelling opportunity at the time.
His bullish view on bitcoin contrasts with a more cautious stance on equities. Jones warned that stock markets are stretched, with valuations that historically point to weak future returns.
At the same time, a wave of upcoming initial public offerings — such as SpaceX and artificial intelligence firms like OpenAI and Anthropic — and reduced share buybacks could increase equity supply, putting additional pressure on prices
If you buy the S&P at this current valuation, the 10-year forward returns [are] negative," he said. "It’s going to be really hard to make money from here."
While he stopped short of calling the current environment a full-blown bubble, he noted that the ratio of U.S. stock market capitalization to GDP remains near historic extremes, echoing levels seen before major downturns such as the dotcom bubble.
In 1929 we were, I think at the top, at 65% [stock market capitalization to GDP] and then in '87 we got to about 85%-90%, in 2000 we got 270%," he noted.
And now we're at 252%, so you can just imagine," he said. "We're clearly so leveraged in equities in this country."
Because of that, a major stock market correction may have broader ramifications on the economy, government budget deficit and the bond market, according to Jones.
10% of our tax revenues are capital gains. They go to zero," he said. "So you can see the budget deficit blowing up. You see the bond market getting smoked."
You can see this kind of negative self-reinforcing effect," he concluded. "It's troubling."
#ArthurHayes’LatestSpeech
#BinanceHerYerde
#CryptoTrends2024
#hottrendingtopics
#JohnCarl
Paul Tudor Jones calls bitcoin the 'best inflation hedge,' warns of overvalued stocks
It will be "really hard to make money" in stocks over the next decade, said the billionaire investor, noting that the S&P 500's valuation reminds him of the 2000 dot-com bubble.
Jones framed bitcoin’s appeal through the lens of past market cycles. During periods of aggressive monetary and fiscal stimulus, such as after the March 2020 pandemic crash, he said inflation trades tend to emerge as central banks inject liquidity into the system.
When you saw all the interventions… you just knew that the inflation trades were going to take off," he said, adding that bitcoin was the most compelling opportunity at the time.
His bullish view on bitcoin contrasts with a more cautious stance on equities. Jones warned that stock markets are stretched, with valuations that historically point to weak future returns.
At the same time, a wave of upcoming initial public offerings — such as SpaceX and artificial intelligence firms like OpenAI and Anthropic — and reduced share buybacks could increase equity supply, putting additional pressure on prices
If you buy the S&P at this current valuation, the 10-year forward returns [are] negative," he said. "It’s going to be really hard to make money from here."
While he stopped short of calling the current environment a full-blown bubble, he noted that the ratio of U.S. stock market capitalization to GDP remains near historic extremes, echoing levels seen before major downturns such as the dotcom bubble.
In 1929 we were, I think at the top, at 65% [stock market capitalization to GDP] and then in '87 we got to about 85%-90%, in 2000 we got 270%," he noted.
And now we're at 252%, so you can just imagine," he said. "We're clearly so leveraged in equities in this country."
Because of that, a major stock market correction may have broader ramifications on the economy, government budget deficit and the bond market, according to Jones.
10% of our tax revenues are capital gains. They go to zero," he said. "So you can see the budget deficit blowing up. You see the bond market getting smoked."
You can see this kind of negative self-reinforcing effect," he concluded. "It's troubling."
#ArthurHayes’LatestSpeech
#BinanceHerYerde
#CryptoTrends2024
#hottrendingtopics
#JohnCarl
Jones framed bitcoin’s appeal through the lens of past market cycles. During periods of aggressive monetary and fiscal stimulus, such as after the March 2020 pandemic crash, he said inflation trades tend to emerge as central banks inject liquidity into the system.
When you saw all the interventions… you just knew that the inflation trades were going to take off," he said, adding that bitcoin was the most compelling opportunity at the time.
His bullish view on bitcoin contrasts with a more cautious stance on equities. Jones warned that stock markets are stretched, with valuations that historically point to weak future returns.
At the same time, a wave of upcoming initial public offerings — such as SpaceX and artificial intelligence firms like OpenAI and Anthropic — and reduced share buybacks could increase equity supply, putting additional pressure on prices
If you buy the S&P at this current valuation, the 10-year forward returns [are] negative," he said. "It’s going to be really hard to make money from here."
While he stopped short of calling the current environment a full-blown bubble, he noted that the ratio of U.S. stock market capitalization to GDP remains near historic extremes, echoing levels seen before major downturns such as the dotcom bubble.
In 1929 we were, I think at the top, at 65% [stock market capitalization to GDP] and then in '87 we got to about 85%-90%, in 2000 we got 270%," he noted.
And now we're at 252%, so you can just imagine," he said. "We're clearly so leveraged in equities in this country."
Because of that, a major stock market correction may have broader ramifications on the economy, government budget deficit and the bond market, according to Jones.
10% of our tax revenues are capital gains. They go to zero," he said. "So you can see the budget deficit blowing up. You see the bond market getting smoked."
You can see this kind of negative self-reinforcing effect," he concluded. "It's troubling."
#ArthurHayes’LatestSpeech
#BinanceHerYerde
#CryptoTrends2024
#hottrendingtopics
#JohnCarl
1
8
Fake Hong Kong stablecoins start trading as real ones remain absentTokens using ‘HKDAP’ and ‘HSBC’ tickers are circulating even as the HKMA says no licensed stablecoins have been issued
Earlier this month, the HKMA granted its first stablecoin licenses under the Stablecoins Ordinance, which took effect in August 2025, selecting two groups from a pool of 36 applicants. The choice of HSBC and a Standard Chartered-led entity mirrors Hong Kong’s existing monetary system, where a small group of commercial banks is authorized to issue banknotes.
The HKMA urged the public to “stay vigilant against fraudulent activities,” advising users to rely only on official communications from licensees and to transact through regulated channels.
Insiders say they expect a launch during Hong Kong's fintech week in November.
#TrendingTopic
#JohnCarl
#GamingCoins
#xmucanX
#PEPEATH
Fake Hong Kong stablecoins start trading as real ones remain absent
Tokens using ‘HKDAP’ and ‘HSBC’ tickers are circulating even as the HKMA says no licensed stablecoins have been issued
Earlier this month, the HKMA granted its first stablecoin licenses under the Stablecoins Ordinance, which took effect in August 2025, selecting two groups from a pool of 36 applicants. The choice of HSBC and a Standard Chartered-led entity mirrors Hong Kong’s existing monetary system, where a small group of commercial banks is authorized to issue banknotes.
The HKMA urged the public to “stay vigilant against fraudulent activities,” advising users to rely only on official communications from licensees and to transact through regulated channels.
Insiders say they expect a launch during Hong Kong's fintech week in November.
#TrendingTopic
#JohnCarl
#GamingCoins
#xmucanX
#PEPEATH
Earlier this month, the HKMA granted its first stablecoin licenses under the Stablecoins Ordinance, which took effect in August 2025, selecting two groups from a pool of 36 applicants. The choice of HSBC and a Standard Chartered-led entity mirrors Hong Kong’s existing monetary system, where a small group of commercial banks is authorized to issue banknotes.
The HKMA urged the public to “stay vigilant against fraudulent activities,” advising users to rely only on official communications from licensees and to transact through regulated channels.
Insiders say they expect a launch during Hong Kong's fintech week in November.
#TrendingTopic
#JohnCarl
#GamingCoins
#xmucanX
#PEPEATH
28
·
--
Friend, I opened a trade 10 days ago and it is still running. The total amount in the account was $700. There is only $300 left. Every day, sometimes $30, sometimes $20, sometimes $40 is lost from my account. Today, the panel shows that the trade is minus $60. But every day, dollars are deducted from my account. What does this mean? Please give me some guidance.
#MarketRebound2025 #CPIWatch #CPIWatch
#BitcoinETFNetInflows #JohnCarl
Friend, I opened a trade 10 days ago and it is still running. The total amount in the account was $700. There is only $300 left. Every day, sometimes $30, sometimes $20, sometimes $40 is lost from my account. Today, the panel shows that the trade is minus $60. But every day, dollars are deducted from my account. What does this mean? Please give me some guidance.
#MarketRebound2025 #CPIWatch #CPIWatch
#BitcoinETFNetInflows #JohnCarl
#MarketRebound2025 #CPIWatch #CPIWatch
#BitcoinETFNetInflows #JohnCarl
4
4
·
--
هابط
🔥 $FF — Volatility Eruption! 🔥
Longs just got obliterated as 2.40K vanished at 0.12378, and the market is flipping the script hard. Now price is coiling right above a crucial support — the perfect battlefield for fast, ruthless moves.
$FF
{spot}(FFUSDT)
🛡 Support: 0.118
🎯 Target: 0.132
🛑 Stop-Loss: 0.114
⚡️Volatility is roaring, momentum is snapping back, and this setup is primed for a quick reversal strike. Stay sharp — the next move could be explosive! 📈🔥
#WriteToEarnUpgrade #JohnCarl #USJobsData #USJobsData #ProjectCrypto
🔥 $FF — Volatility Eruption! 🔥
Longs just got obliterated as 2.40K vanished at 0.12378, and the market is flipping the script hard. Now price is coiling right above a crucial support — the perfect battlefield for fast, ruthless moves.
$FF
🛡 Support: 0.118
🎯 Target: 0.132
🛑 Stop-Loss: 0.114
⚡️Volatility is roaring, momentum is snapping back, and this setup is primed for a quick reversal strike. Stay sharp — the next move could be explosive! 📈🔥
#WriteToEarnUpgrade #JohnCarl #USJobsData #USJobsData #ProjectCrypto
Longs just got obliterated as 2.40K vanished at 0.12378, and the market is flipping the script hard. Now price is coiling right above a crucial support — the perfect battlefield for fast, ruthless moves.
$FF
🛡 Support: 0.118
🎯 Target: 0.132
🛑 Stop-Loss: 0.114
⚡️Volatility is roaring, momentum is snapping back, and this setup is primed for a quick reversal strike. Stay sharp — the next move could be explosive! 📈🔥
#WriteToEarnUpgrade #JohnCarl #USJobsData #USJobsData #ProjectCrypto
1
15
مقالة
Trump-backed World Liberty Financial says USD1 short and social media attack fails as stablecoin briUSD1 briefly fell to about $0.99707 on Monday morning, according to The Block’s data, a drop that typically would not be considered a stablecoin depeg.
Attackers hacked several WLFI cofounder accounts, paid influencers to spread FUD, and opened massive $WLFI shorts to profit from the manufactured chaos,” the Trump-backed company posted on X. “It didn’t work.”
World Liberty Financial, one of the Trump family’s major crypto initiatives, sent an alert on Monday morning warning of a "coordinated attack" against its USD1 stablecoin. The dollar-pegged token briefly fell to about $0.99707 on Monday morning, The Block's data shows.
Attackers hacked several WLFI cofounder accounts, paid influencers to spread FUD, and opened massive $WLFI shorts to profit from the manufactured chaos," the company posted on X. "It didn’t work. Thanks to USD1's sound mint-and-redeem mechanism and full 1:1 backing, we are trading steadily at par."
World Liberty co-founder Eric Trump deleted several WLFI posts on X prior to the coin's move lower, according to market observer Wu Blockchain.
The mechanism of the alleged attack is unclear at the time of writing. USD1 is backed by reserves held in custody by BitGo, including short-term U.S. Treasuries. The token is currently trading closer to its $1 peg.
Tiny stablecoin price deviations happen nearly constantly due to trading spreads, liquidity, exchange differences, and arbitrage lags. A 0.01%-0.03% price fluctuation is generally not considered to be a depeg, unless sustained for a significant period of time, according to most experts.
Earlier this year, WLTC Holdings LLC filed an application to establish a national trust bank to expand its USD1 operations. World Liberty is also involved in crypto lending.
The Trump-backed company drew controversy earlier this year over potential conflicts of interest after a United Arab Emirates-based entity used the USD1 stablecoin to facilitate a $2 billion investment in Binance. Additionally, an Abu Dhabi investment vehicle backed by UAE National Security Adviser Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan purchased a 49% stake in World Liberty Financial for $500 million before President Donald Trump’s inauguration.
Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange formerly led by Changpeng Zhao, who President Trump pardoned, also elevated the status of USD1 as a trading pair on its platform.
#Robertkiyosaki
#kdmrcrypto
#ZAIBOTIO
#JohnCarl
#Altcoins!
Trump-backed World Liberty Financial says USD1 short and social media attack fails as stablecoin bri
USD1 briefly fell to about $0.99707 on Monday morning, according to The Block’s data, a drop that typically would not be considered a stablecoin depeg.
Attackers hacked several WLFI cofounder accounts, paid influencers to spread FUD, and opened massive $WLFI shorts to profit from the manufactured chaos,” the Trump-backed company posted on X. “It didn’t work.”
World Liberty Financial, one of the Trump family’s major crypto initiatives, sent an alert on Monday morning warning of a "coordinated attack" against its USD1 stablecoin. The dollar-pegged token briefly fell to about $0.99707 on Monday morning, The Block's data shows.
Attackers hacked several WLFI cofounder accounts, paid influencers to spread FUD, and opened massive $WLFI shorts to profit from the manufactured chaos," the company posted on X. "It didn’t work. Thanks to USD1's sound mint-and-redeem mechanism and full 1:1 backing, we are trading steadily at par."
World Liberty co-founder Eric Trump deleted several WLFI posts on X prior to the coin's move lower, according to market observer Wu Blockchain.
The mechanism of the alleged attack is unclear at the time of writing. USD1 is backed by reserves held in custody by BitGo, including short-term U.S. Treasuries. The token is currently trading closer to its $1 peg.
Tiny stablecoin price deviations happen nearly constantly due to trading spreads, liquidity, exchange differences, and arbitrage lags. A 0.01%-0.03% price fluctuation is generally not considered to be a depeg, unless sustained for a significant period of time, according to most experts.
Earlier this year, WLTC Holdings LLC filed an application to establish a national trust bank to expand its USD1 operations. World Liberty is also involved in crypto lending.
The Trump-backed company drew controversy earlier this year over potential conflicts of interest after a United Arab Emirates-based entity used the USD1 stablecoin to facilitate a $2 billion investment in Binance. Additionally, an Abu Dhabi investment vehicle backed by UAE National Security Adviser Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan purchased a 49% stake in World Liberty Financial for $500 million before President Donald Trump’s inauguration.
Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange formerly led by Changpeng Zhao, who President Trump pardoned, also elevated the status of USD1 as a trading pair on its platform.
#Robertkiyosaki
#kdmrcrypto
#ZAIBOTIO
#JohnCarl
#Altcoins!
Attackers hacked several WLFI cofounder accounts, paid influencers to spread FUD, and opened massive $WLFI shorts to profit from the manufactured chaos,” the Trump-backed company posted on X. “It didn’t work.”
World Liberty Financial, one of the Trump family’s major crypto initiatives, sent an alert on Monday morning warning of a "coordinated attack" against its USD1 stablecoin. The dollar-pegged token briefly fell to about $0.99707 on Monday morning, The Block's data shows.
Attackers hacked several WLFI cofounder accounts, paid influencers to spread FUD, and opened massive $WLFI shorts to profit from the manufactured chaos," the company posted on X. "It didn’t work. Thanks to USD1's sound mint-and-redeem mechanism and full 1:1 backing, we are trading steadily at par."
World Liberty co-founder Eric Trump deleted several WLFI posts on X prior to the coin's move lower, according to market observer Wu Blockchain.
The mechanism of the alleged attack is unclear at the time of writing. USD1 is backed by reserves held in custody by BitGo, including short-term U.S. Treasuries. The token is currently trading closer to its $1 peg.
Tiny stablecoin price deviations happen nearly constantly due to trading spreads, liquidity, exchange differences, and arbitrage lags. A 0.01%-0.03% price fluctuation is generally not considered to be a depeg, unless sustained for a significant period of time, according to most experts.
Earlier this year, WLTC Holdings LLC filed an application to establish a national trust bank to expand its USD1 operations. World Liberty is also involved in crypto lending.
The Trump-backed company drew controversy earlier this year over potential conflicts of interest after a United Arab Emirates-based entity used the USD1 stablecoin to facilitate a $2 billion investment in Binance. Additionally, an Abu Dhabi investment vehicle backed by UAE National Security Adviser Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan purchased a 49% stake in World Liberty Financial for $500 million before President Donald Trump’s inauguration.
Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange formerly led by Changpeng Zhao, who President Trump pardoned, also elevated the status of USD1 as a trading pair on its platform.
#Robertkiyosaki
#kdmrcrypto
#ZAIBOTIO
#JohnCarl
#Altcoins!
1
285
مقالة
XRP bearish trend persists despite key buy signalXRP faces a weak derivatives market as traders increasingly pile into bearish positions.
XRP remains largely in bearish hands amid a 2% intraday drawdown to $1.45
Ripple (XRP) edges lower at the time of writing on Tuesday, from the daily open of $1.48, as headwinds persist across the crypto market. A short-term support is emerging at $1.45, but a buildup of bearish positions could further weaken the derivatives market and prolong the correction.
The overall technical structure remains mostly bearish despite the MACD recently confirming a buy signal.
Mixed outlook as XRP retail demand weakens
XRP is struggling to sustain its recovery, leading to volatile price fluctuations as retail interest wobbles. After the XRP futures Open Interest (OI) increased to $2.56 billion on Monday, it narrows to $2.53 billion on Tuesday, undermining last week’s optimism that propelled the price to $1.67 on Sunday.
OI remains significantly below the record high of $10.94 billion in July. As OI fades, traders close positions in droves and refuse to open new ones, leaving XRP vulnerable to market pressures and risk-off sentiment
CoinGlass data shows that traders are increasingly piling into short positions, suggesting a lack of conviction in XRP’s short-term bullish outlook. The OI-Weighted Funding Rate holds at -0.0078% on Tuesday, remaining in the negative region since Sunday. Without follow-through momentum, price fluctuations will persist amid an overall bearish trend.
XRP hovers above $1.45 while sitting well below the 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) at $1.72, the 100-day EMA at $1.93 and the 200-day EMA at $2.13. All three moving averages are descending, confirming a deteriorating technical structure and increasing the odds of prolonging the ongoing correction.
Technical outlook: Evaluating XRP market structure
The descending trend line from $3.66 (record high) would limit gains, with resistance seen near $2.10. Moreover, the Parabolic SAR indicator trails below the price at $1.21, offering initial support that, if lost, could extend the bearish sequence. On the other hand, the improving MACD momentum would favor a push toward Sunday's high at $1.67.
Meanwhile, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) at 40.76 remains below the midline on the daily chart, tempering the upside despite a recent momentum shift when the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) crossed above its signal line on the same chart. The expanding green histogram bars may prompt traders to increase their exposure, especially if XRP defends a short-term support at $1.45, tested on Monday.
#altcycle
#skyark
#xrp
#flt21
#johncarl
XRP bearish trend persists despite key buy signal
XRP faces a weak derivatives market as traders increasingly pile into bearish positions.
XRP remains largely in bearish hands amid a 2% intraday drawdown to $1.45
Ripple (XRP) edges lower at the time of writing on Tuesday, from the daily open of $1.48, as headwinds persist across the crypto market. A short-term support is emerging at $1.45, but a buildup of bearish positions could further weaken the derivatives market and prolong the correction.
The overall technical structure remains mostly bearish despite the MACD recently confirming a buy signal.
Mixed outlook as XRP retail demand weakens
XRP is struggling to sustain its recovery, leading to volatile price fluctuations as retail interest wobbles. After the XRP futures Open Interest (OI) increased to $2.56 billion on Monday, it narrows to $2.53 billion on Tuesday, undermining last week’s optimism that propelled the price to $1.67 on Sunday.
OI remains significantly below the record high of $10.94 billion in July. As OI fades, traders close positions in droves and refuse to open new ones, leaving XRP vulnerable to market pressures and risk-off sentiment
CoinGlass data shows that traders are increasingly piling into short positions, suggesting a lack of conviction in XRP’s short-term bullish outlook. The OI-Weighted Funding Rate holds at -0.0078% on Tuesday, remaining in the negative region since Sunday. Without follow-through momentum, price fluctuations will persist amid an overall bearish trend.
XRP hovers above $1.45 while sitting well below the 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) at $1.72, the 100-day EMA at $1.93 and the 200-day EMA at $2.13. All three moving averages are descending, confirming a deteriorating technical structure and increasing the odds of prolonging the ongoing correction.
Technical outlook: Evaluating XRP market structure
The descending trend line from $3.66 (record high) would limit gains, with resistance seen near $2.10. Moreover, the Parabolic SAR indicator trails below the price at $1.21, offering initial support that, if lost, could extend the bearish sequence. On the other hand, the improving MACD momentum would favor a push toward Sunday's high at $1.67.
Meanwhile, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) at 40.76 remains below the midline on the daily chart, tempering the upside despite a recent momentum shift when the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) crossed above its signal line on the same chart. The expanding green histogram bars may prompt traders to increase their exposure, especially if XRP defends a short-term support at $1.45, tested on Monday.
#altcycle
#skyark
#xrp
#flt21
#johncarl
XRP remains largely in bearish hands amid a 2% intraday drawdown to $1.45
Ripple (XRP) edges lower at the time of writing on Tuesday, from the daily open of $1.48, as headwinds persist across the crypto market. A short-term support is emerging at $1.45, but a buildup of bearish positions could further weaken the derivatives market and prolong the correction.
The overall technical structure remains mostly bearish despite the MACD recently confirming a buy signal.
Mixed outlook as XRP retail demand weakens
XRP is struggling to sustain its recovery, leading to volatile price fluctuations as retail interest wobbles. After the XRP futures Open Interest (OI) increased to $2.56 billion on Monday, it narrows to $2.53 billion on Tuesday, undermining last week’s optimism that propelled the price to $1.67 on Sunday.
OI remains significantly below the record high of $10.94 billion in July. As OI fades, traders close positions in droves and refuse to open new ones, leaving XRP vulnerable to market pressures and risk-off sentiment
CoinGlass data shows that traders are increasingly piling into short positions, suggesting a lack of conviction in XRP’s short-term bullish outlook. The OI-Weighted Funding Rate holds at -0.0078% on Tuesday, remaining in the negative region since Sunday. Without follow-through momentum, price fluctuations will persist amid an overall bearish trend.
XRP hovers above $1.45 while sitting well below the 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) at $1.72, the 100-day EMA at $1.93 and the 200-day EMA at $2.13. All three moving averages are descending, confirming a deteriorating technical structure and increasing the odds of prolonging the ongoing correction.
Technical outlook: Evaluating XRP market structure
The descending trend line from $3.66 (record high) would limit gains, with resistance seen near $2.10. Moreover, the Parabolic SAR indicator trails below the price at $1.21, offering initial support that, if lost, could extend the bearish sequence. On the other hand, the improving MACD momentum would favor a push toward Sunday's high at $1.67.
Meanwhile, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) at 40.76 remains below the midline on the daily chart, tempering the upside despite a recent momentum shift when the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) crossed above its signal line on the same chart. The expanding green histogram bars may prompt traders to increase their exposure, especially if XRP defends a short-term support at $1.45, tested on Monday.
#altcycle
#skyark
#xrp
#flt21
#johncarl
1
105
مقالة
XRP outruns bitcoin, ether after investors piled into the recent crashXRP is outperforming bitcoin and ether following signs of dip buying during recent crash.
This performance puts it well ahead of both bitcoin and ether, which have gained roughly 15% since Feb. 6. Bitcoin and ether recently changed hands at $69,420 and $2,020, respectively.
XRP's bitcoin-beating rally tracks signs of dip-buying on Binance following the crash. CryptoQuant data indicates Binance's XRP reserves dropped by 192.37 million XRP to 2.553 billion between Feb. 7 and 9. The 7% slide marked the lowest level since January 2024, and holdings have remained stable since then.
Analysts typically associate a drop in exchange balances with investor accumulation. The logic is that investors prefer to take direct custody of coins rather than keep them on exchanges when they plan to hold them long-term.
Sudden, sharp withdrawals can reduce available supply, opening the door to a price rally. Historical trends reinforce this view. XRP rallied sharply from $0.60 to over $2.40 in the final two months of 2024 as the balance held on exchanges slid faster.
#XRP
#usdtfree
#Johncarl
#Dogecoin
#Icp
XRP outruns bitcoin, ether after investors piled into the recent crash
XRP is outperforming bitcoin and ether following signs of dip buying during recent crash.
This performance puts it well ahead of both bitcoin and ether, which have gained roughly 15% since Feb. 6. Bitcoin and ether recently changed hands at $69,420 and $2,020, respectively.
XRP's bitcoin-beating rally tracks signs of dip-buying on Binance following the crash. CryptoQuant data indicates Binance's XRP reserves dropped by 192.37 million XRP to 2.553 billion between Feb. 7 and 9. The 7% slide marked the lowest level since January 2024, and holdings have remained stable since then.
Analysts typically associate a drop in exchange balances with investor accumulation. The logic is that investors prefer to take direct custody of coins rather than keep them on exchanges when they plan to hold them long-term.
Sudden, sharp withdrawals can reduce available supply, opening the door to a price rally. Historical trends reinforce this view. XRP rallied sharply from $0.60 to over $2.40 in the final two months of 2024 as the balance held on exchanges slid faster.
#XRP
#usdtfree
#Johncarl
#Dogecoin
#Icp
This performance puts it well ahead of both bitcoin and ether, which have gained roughly 15% since Feb. 6. Bitcoin and ether recently changed hands at $69,420 and $2,020, respectively.
XRP's bitcoin-beating rally tracks signs of dip-buying on Binance following the crash. CryptoQuant data indicates Binance's XRP reserves dropped by 192.37 million XRP to 2.553 billion between Feb. 7 and 9. The 7% slide marked the lowest level since January 2024, and holdings have remained stable since then.
Analysts typically associate a drop in exchange balances with investor accumulation. The logic is that investors prefer to take direct custody of coins rather than keep them on exchanges when they plan to hold them long-term.
Sudden, sharp withdrawals can reduce available supply, opening the door to a price rally. Historical trends reinforce this view. XRP rallied sharply from $0.60 to over $2.40 in the final two months of 2024 as the balance held on exchanges slid faster.
#XRP
#usdtfree
#Johncarl
#Dogecoin
#Icp
2
157
مقالة
Oil Prices Drop as the G7 Considers Releasing Up to 400 Million BarrelsThe finance ministers of the G7 will discuss the possibility of releasing oil from storage in response to the price rally resulting from the war in the Middle East, media, including the Financial Times and the Australian Financial Review, have reported, citing unnamed sources.
The emergency meeting of the officials, also involving the head of the International Energy Agency, will take place later today, with plans under consideration including the amount of 300 to 400 million barrels.
The volumes mentioned in the reports prompted a selloff in oil, with Brent crude and WTI shedding some of their latest gains. The two are still trading above $100 a barrel, however. The volumes to be discussed are significantly higher than the amount that the IEA released back in 2022 after the price spike following Russia’s incursion into Ukraine. At the time, the IEA coordinated a release of 240 million barrels, with half of that coming from the United States, InvestingLive noted in a report.
The Financial Times, meanwhile, said in its report that three IEA members, including the United States, had expressed interest in the joint release, which follows a statement by the IEA’s Fatih Birol from last Friday, saying that there was “plenty of oil” on the market and there were no plans for emergency releases of oil from joint stocks.
There is plenty of oil, we have no oil shortage,” Birol said after a meeting with European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and Commission members. “There is a huge surplus in the market.”
Apparently, the surplus has vanished, with the U.S. lifting some sanctions on Russian crude that will now go to India, but will be nowhere near enough to do much about the global supply squeeze, hence the stockpile release discussion. Even if the G7 and IEA agree to release 400 million barrels of oil, chances are this will not have too marked an effect on prices in the absence of signs that supply will normalize.
#HalvingUpdate
#JohnCarl
#kriptohaber24
#LISTAAirdrop
#FactCheck
Oil Prices Drop as the G7 Considers Releasing Up to 400 Million Barrels
The finance ministers of the G7 will discuss the possibility of releasing oil from storage in response to the price rally resulting from the war in the Middle East, media, including the Financial Times and the Australian Financial Review, have reported, citing unnamed sources.
The emergency meeting of the officials, also involving the head of the International Energy Agency, will take place later today, with plans under consideration including the amount of 300 to 400 million barrels.
The volumes mentioned in the reports prompted a selloff in oil, with Brent crude and WTI shedding some of their latest gains. The two are still trading above $100 a barrel, however. The volumes to be discussed are significantly higher than the amount that the IEA released back in 2022 after the price spike following Russia’s incursion into Ukraine. At the time, the IEA coordinated a release of 240 million barrels, with half of that coming from the United States, InvestingLive noted in a report.
The Financial Times, meanwhile, said in its report that three IEA members, including the United States, had expressed interest in the joint release, which follows a statement by the IEA’s Fatih Birol from last Friday, saying that there was “plenty of oil” on the market and there were no plans for emergency releases of oil from joint stocks.
There is plenty of oil, we have no oil shortage,” Birol said after a meeting with European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and Commission members. “There is a huge surplus in the market.”
Apparently, the surplus has vanished, with the U.S. lifting some sanctions on Russian crude that will now go to India, but will be nowhere near enough to do much about the global supply squeeze, hence the stockpile release discussion. Even if the G7 and IEA agree to release 400 million barrels of oil, chances are this will not have too marked an effect on prices in the absence of signs that supply will normalize.
#HalvingUpdate
#JohnCarl
#kriptohaber24
#LISTAAirdrop
#FactCheck
The emergency meeting of the officials, also involving the head of the International Energy Agency, will take place later today, with plans under consideration including the amount of 300 to 400 million barrels.
The volumes mentioned in the reports prompted a selloff in oil, with Brent crude and WTI shedding some of their latest gains. The two are still trading above $100 a barrel, however. The volumes to be discussed are significantly higher than the amount that the IEA released back in 2022 after the price spike following Russia’s incursion into Ukraine. At the time, the IEA coordinated a release of 240 million barrels, with half of that coming from the United States, InvestingLive noted in a report.
The Financial Times, meanwhile, said in its report that three IEA members, including the United States, had expressed interest in the joint release, which follows a statement by the IEA’s Fatih Birol from last Friday, saying that there was “plenty of oil” on the market and there were no plans for emergency releases of oil from joint stocks.
There is plenty of oil, we have no oil shortage,” Birol said after a meeting with European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and Commission members. “There is a huge surplus in the market.”
Apparently, the surplus has vanished, with the U.S. lifting some sanctions on Russian crude that will now go to India, but will be nowhere near enough to do much about the global supply squeeze, hence the stockpile release discussion. Even if the G7 and IEA agree to release 400 million barrels of oil, chances are this will not have too marked an effect on prices in the absence of signs that supply will normalize.
#HalvingUpdate
#JohnCarl
#kriptohaber24
#LISTAAirdrop
#FactCheck
139
Rakuten to allow XRP to be used as payment method by its 44 million customersRakuten Pay users will also be able to spot trade XRP via the Rakuten Pay app and exchange the Japanese e-commerce giant’s points to purchase Ripple’s token
The move ties XRP into one of Japan’s largest loyalty systems, where more than 3 trillion points—worth roughly $23 billion—are in circulation and can now be converted into XRP, Kohrogi said.
Starting April 15, Rakuten Wallet will launch XRP as both a listed asset and a payment method, meaning users can buy XRP directly with Rakuten Points and charge their Rakuten Cash with XRP to spend it at over 5 million merchant locations across Japan,” Kohrogi said, calling the development “one of the most significant XRP milestones.”
The Ripple executive also said Rakuten is one of Japan's most trusted consumer brands. “The fact that XRP is now embedded into its loyalty and payments infrastructure is a powerful signal of where digital asset adoption is heading,” he added.
Rakuten began allowing users to spend bitcoin, ether and bitcoin cash in 2023. In 2021, the Japanese e-commerce giant announced the launch of its own Rakuten Coin, a token it said would be used as part of its points-based loyalty rewards system.
#xmucan
#VOTEme
#Binance
#JohnCarl
#Kabosu
Rakuten to allow XRP to be used as payment method by its 44 million customers
Rakuten Pay users will also be able to spot trade XRP via the Rakuten Pay app and exchange the Japanese e-commerce giant’s points to purchase Ripple’s token
The move ties XRP into one of Japan’s largest loyalty systems, where more than 3 trillion points—worth roughly $23 billion—are in circulation and can now be converted into XRP, Kohrogi said.
Starting April 15, Rakuten Wallet will launch XRP as both a listed asset and a payment method, meaning users can buy XRP directly with Rakuten Points and charge their Rakuten Cash with XRP to spend it at over 5 million merchant locations across Japan,” Kohrogi said, calling the development “one of the most significant XRP milestones.”
The Ripple executive also said Rakuten is one of Japan's most trusted consumer brands. “The fact that XRP is now embedded into its loyalty and payments infrastructure is a powerful signal of where digital asset adoption is heading,” he added.
Rakuten began allowing users to spend bitcoin, ether and bitcoin cash in 2023. In 2021, the Japanese e-commerce giant announced the launch of its own Rakuten Coin, a token it said would be used as part of its points-based loyalty rewards system.
#xmucan
#VOTEme
#Binance
#JohnCarl
#Kabosu
The move ties XRP into one of Japan’s largest loyalty systems, where more than 3 trillion points—worth roughly $23 billion—are in circulation and can now be converted into XRP, Kohrogi said.
Starting April 15, Rakuten Wallet will launch XRP as both a listed asset and a payment method, meaning users can buy XRP directly with Rakuten Points and charge their Rakuten Cash with XRP to spend it at over 5 million merchant locations across Japan,” Kohrogi said, calling the development “one of the most significant XRP milestones.”
The Ripple executive also said Rakuten is one of Japan's most trusted consumer brands. “The fact that XRP is now embedded into its loyalty and payments infrastructure is a powerful signal of where digital asset adoption is heading,” he added.
Rakuten began allowing users to spend bitcoin, ether and bitcoin cash in 2023. In 2021, the Japanese e-commerce giant announced the launch of its own Rakuten Coin, a token it said would be used as part of its points-based loyalty rewards system.
#xmucan
#VOTEme
#Binance
#JohnCarl
#Kabosu
8
·
--
صاعد
🚀 $ICP at $5… and Ready to Shock the Market? ⚡️
Everyone’s watching… 👀
Why? Because this beast once blasted to over $700 at launch — and the ecosystem has only gotten stronger since. 🔥
$ICP
{spot}(ICPUSDT)
Now it’s sitting at $5, quietly loading the slingshot… 🎯
New devs piling in.
New integrations.
A community hungry for a comeback.
💥 Is 2025 the year ICP wakes up and goes full supernova?
Nobody can predict—but when a coin that once dominated the charts goes silent… that’s when the real opportunities often start brewing. 🌌
Strap in. The calm doesn’t last forever. 🚀🔥
#StablecoinLaw #JohnCarl #gaming #CFTCCryptoSprint #StrategyBTCPurchase
🚀 $ICP at $5… and Ready to Shock the Market? ⚡️
Everyone’s watching… 👀
Why? Because this beast once blasted to over $700 at launch — and the ecosystem has only gotten stronger since. 🔥
$ICP
Now it’s sitting at $5, quietly loading the slingshot… 🎯
New devs piling in.
New integrations.
A community hungry for a comeback.
💥 Is 2025 the year ICP wakes up and goes full supernova?
Nobody can predict—but when a coin that once dominated the charts goes silent… that’s when the real opportunities often start brewing. 🌌
Strap in. The calm doesn’t last forever. 🚀🔥
#StablecoinLaw #JohnCarl #gaming #CFTCCryptoSprint #StrategyBTCPurchase
Everyone’s watching… 👀
Why? Because this beast once blasted to over $700 at launch — and the ecosystem has only gotten stronger since. 🔥
$ICP
Now it’s sitting at $5, quietly loading the slingshot… 🎯
New devs piling in.
New integrations.
A community hungry for a comeback.
💥 Is 2025 the year ICP wakes up and goes full supernova?
Nobody can predict—but when a coin that once dominated the charts goes silent… that’s when the real opportunities often start brewing. 🌌
Strap in. The calm doesn’t last forever. 🚀🔥
#StablecoinLaw #JohnCarl #gaming #CFTCCryptoSprint #StrategyBTCPurchase
2
409
مقالة
Elon Musk's X to launch crypto and stock trading in ‘couple weeks’Users will be able to interact with ticker symbols in posts and execute trades within the app, the company's head of product said.
The announcement comes as the company prepares to launch an external beta of X Money, its in-house payments system. Musk said the tool is already live in internal testing and will be available to a limited group of users within one to two months.
The idea is to make X a one-stop platform where users can message, post, send money and invest, a version of Musk’s “everything app” vision.
He’s compared the rollout of financial tools like X Money to adding banking services inside the app, saying users could eventually manage most of their daily digital activity without leaving the platform.
Elon Musk’s companies have been involved with crypto in the past. His electric car maker Tesla owns 11,509 bitcoin on its balance sheet, down from an initial investment of 42,300 made in early 2021. SpaceX currently controls around 8,285 BTC.
Over the years Musk has also shown support for the meme-inspired cryptocurrency dogecoin. In 2022, he said SpaceX would accept DOGE for some merchanside, echoing an earlier move from Tesla. Earlier this month, Musk said he may put DOGE “on the moon.”
#ElonMusk
#Robofl
#hotTrends
#JohnCarl
#PEPE
Elon Musk's X to launch crypto and stock trading in ‘couple weeks’
Users will be able to interact with ticker symbols in posts and execute trades within the app, the company's head of product said.
The announcement comes as the company prepares to launch an external beta of X Money, its in-house payments system. Musk said the tool is already live in internal testing and will be available to a limited group of users within one to two months.
The idea is to make X a one-stop platform where users can message, post, send money and invest, a version of Musk’s “everything app” vision.
He’s compared the rollout of financial tools like X Money to adding banking services inside the app, saying users could eventually manage most of their daily digital activity without leaving the platform.
Elon Musk’s companies have been involved with crypto in the past. His electric car maker Tesla owns 11,509 bitcoin on its balance sheet, down from an initial investment of 42,300 made in early 2021. SpaceX currently controls around 8,285 BTC.
Over the years Musk has also shown support for the meme-inspired cryptocurrency dogecoin. In 2022, he said SpaceX would accept DOGE for some merchanside, echoing an earlier move from Tesla. Earlier this month, Musk said he may put DOGE “on the moon.”
#ElonMusk
#Robofl
#hotTrends
#JohnCarl
#PEPE
The announcement comes as the company prepares to launch an external beta of X Money, its in-house payments system. Musk said the tool is already live in internal testing and will be available to a limited group of users within one to two months.
The idea is to make X a one-stop platform where users can message, post, send money and invest, a version of Musk’s “everything app” vision.
He’s compared the rollout of financial tools like X Money to adding banking services inside the app, saying users could eventually manage most of their daily digital activity without leaving the platform.
Elon Musk’s companies have been involved with crypto in the past. His electric car maker Tesla owns 11,509 bitcoin on its balance sheet, down from an initial investment of 42,300 made in early 2021. SpaceX currently controls around 8,285 BTC.
Over the years Musk has also shown support for the meme-inspired cryptocurrency dogecoin. In 2022, he said SpaceX would accept DOGE for some merchanside, echoing an earlier move from Tesla. Earlier this month, Musk said he may put DOGE “on the moon.”
#ElonMusk
#Robofl
#hotTrends
#JohnCarl
#PEPE
1
·
--
صاعد
$JCT IS RISING TOKEN UP +14.51%, GAINING MOMENTUM! 📈
Price: $0.0016928
24H Gain: +14.51%
Targets:
0.0020567
0.0024196
0.0027805 (estimated next)
Stop Loss: 0.0013309
Market Cap: $19.46M
**FDV:** $84.64M
Volume building with on-chain momentum. Trading above MA(7) and MA(25) uptrend could continue!#JCT #JohnCarl #Jasmyusdt⚠️⚠️
$JCT IS RISING TOKEN UP +14.51%, GAINING MOMENTUM! 📈
Price: $0.0016928
24H Gain: +14.51%
Targets:
0.0020567
0.0024196
0.0027805 (estimated next)
Stop Loss: 0.0013309
Market Cap: $19.46M
**FDV:** $84.64M
Volume building with on-chain momentum. Trading above MA(7) and MA(25) uptrend could continue!#JCT #JohnCarl #Jasmyusdt⚠️⚠️
Price: $0.0016928
24H Gain: +14.51%
Targets:
0.0020567
0.0024196
0.0027805 (estimated next)
Stop Loss: 0.0013309
Market Cap: $19.46M
**FDV:** $84.64M
Volume building with on-chain momentum. Trading above MA(7) and MA(25) uptrend could continue!#JCT #JohnCarl #Jasmyusdt⚠️⚠️
1
4
مقالة
House Democrats press Treasury Sec. Bessent over OCC review of Trump-linked World Liberty Financial'House Democrats have sent a formal letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent questioning the OCC’s review of World Liberty Financial’s application for a national trust bank charter.
The letter seeks clarity on safeguards to protect regulatory independence and asks what role, if any, the White House and Treasury play in the OCC’s decision-making.
House Democrats have formally pressed Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent for answers about the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s review of World Liberty Financial’s application for a national trust bank charter, raising concerns about foreign ownership, national security, and regulatory independence.
In a letter on Thursday, Rep. Gregory Meeks, the ranking member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and other Democratic lawmakers asked Bessent to clarify what safeguards are in place to ensure the OCC’s chartering process is still insulated from political or foreign influence.
World Liberty Financial is a Trump-linked crypto venture seeking a federal trust bank charter to issue stablecoins and provide custody services.
The lawmakers pointed to World Liberty Financial’s ties to President Donald Trump and cited reports of foreign investment in the firm as factors warranting heightened scrutiny. They asked Treasury to detail the extent of any involvement by the White House or the department in the OCC’s review and to explain how potential conflicts of interest are being addressed.
A national trust bank charter, granted by the OCC, would place the company under federal supervision and potentially expand its ability to custody digital assets or provide related services across state lines. The chartering process is typically handled by the OCC, an independent bureau within Treasury.
The inquiry shifts the focus from public hearing exchanges to a formal, written request for documentation and clarification, placing Treasury under direct pressure to respond on the record.
The scrutiny also follows earlier questioning of Bessent on Capitol Hill over World Liberty Financial and broader concerns about potential conflicts tied to Trump-affiliated crypto ventures. In that exchange, Bessent said Treasury does not have the authority to “bail out bitcoin” and emphasized the department’s limited role in certain regulatory domains.
While this week's letter represents a new escalation in the form of a documented request for answers, the underlying themes are familiar.
Indeed, the request follows a string of Democratic actions tied to the reported 49% UAE stake in World Liberty Financial. Sens. Warren and Kim have demanded a national security review, and Rep. Ro Khanna opened a separate House probe into the $500 million investment, first detailed by the Wall Street Journal.
President Trump has said he was aware of the supposed deal.
#JohnCarl
#Fatihcoşar
#Robertkiyosaki
#xmucan
#DelistingAlert
House Democrats press Treasury Sec. Bessent over OCC review of Trump-linked World Liberty Financial'
House Democrats have sent a formal letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent questioning the OCC’s review of World Liberty Financial’s application for a national trust bank charter.
The letter seeks clarity on safeguards to protect regulatory independence and asks what role, if any, the White House and Treasury play in the OCC’s decision-making.
House Democrats have formally pressed Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent for answers about the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s review of World Liberty Financial’s application for a national trust bank charter, raising concerns about foreign ownership, national security, and regulatory independence.
In a letter on Thursday, Rep. Gregory Meeks, the ranking member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and other Democratic lawmakers asked Bessent to clarify what safeguards are in place to ensure the OCC’s chartering process is still insulated from political or foreign influence.
World Liberty Financial is a Trump-linked crypto venture seeking a federal trust bank charter to issue stablecoins and provide custody services.
The lawmakers pointed to World Liberty Financial’s ties to President Donald Trump and cited reports of foreign investment in the firm as factors warranting heightened scrutiny. They asked Treasury to detail the extent of any involvement by the White House or the department in the OCC’s review and to explain how potential conflicts of interest are being addressed.
A national trust bank charter, granted by the OCC, would place the company under federal supervision and potentially expand its ability to custody digital assets or provide related services across state lines. The chartering process is typically handled by the OCC, an independent bureau within Treasury.
The inquiry shifts the focus from public hearing exchanges to a formal, written request for documentation and clarification, placing Treasury under direct pressure to respond on the record.
The scrutiny also follows earlier questioning of Bessent on Capitol Hill over World Liberty Financial and broader concerns about potential conflicts tied to Trump-affiliated crypto ventures. In that exchange, Bessent said Treasury does not have the authority to “bail out bitcoin” and emphasized the department’s limited role in certain regulatory domains.
While this week's letter represents a new escalation in the form of a documented request for answers, the underlying themes are familiar.
Indeed, the request follows a string of Democratic actions tied to the reported 49% UAE stake in World Liberty Financial. Sens. Warren and Kim have demanded a national security review, and Rep. Ro Khanna opened a separate House probe into the $500 million investment, first detailed by the Wall Street Journal.
President Trump has said he was aware of the supposed deal.
#JohnCarl
#Fatihcoşar
#Robertkiyosaki
#xmucan
#DelistingAlert
The letter seeks clarity on safeguards to protect regulatory independence and asks what role, if any, the White House and Treasury play in the OCC’s decision-making.
House Democrats have formally pressed Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent for answers about the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s review of World Liberty Financial’s application for a national trust bank charter, raising concerns about foreign ownership, national security, and regulatory independence.
In a letter on Thursday, Rep. Gregory Meeks, the ranking member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and other Democratic lawmakers asked Bessent to clarify what safeguards are in place to ensure the OCC’s chartering process is still insulated from political or foreign influence.
World Liberty Financial is a Trump-linked crypto venture seeking a federal trust bank charter to issue stablecoins and provide custody services.
The lawmakers pointed to World Liberty Financial’s ties to President Donald Trump and cited reports of foreign investment in the firm as factors warranting heightened scrutiny. They asked Treasury to detail the extent of any involvement by the White House or the department in the OCC’s review and to explain how potential conflicts of interest are being addressed.
A national trust bank charter, granted by the OCC, would place the company under federal supervision and potentially expand its ability to custody digital assets or provide related services across state lines. The chartering process is typically handled by the OCC, an independent bureau within Treasury.
The inquiry shifts the focus from public hearing exchanges to a formal, written request for documentation and clarification, placing Treasury under direct pressure to respond on the record.
The scrutiny also follows earlier questioning of Bessent on Capitol Hill over World Liberty Financial and broader concerns about potential conflicts tied to Trump-affiliated crypto ventures. In that exchange, Bessent said Treasury does not have the authority to “bail out bitcoin” and emphasized the department’s limited role in certain regulatory domains.
While this week's letter represents a new escalation in the form of a documented request for answers, the underlying themes are familiar.
Indeed, the request follows a string of Democratic actions tied to the reported 49% UAE stake in World Liberty Financial. Sens. Warren and Kim have demanded a national security review, and Rep. Ro Khanna opened a separate House probe into the $500 million investment, first detailed by the Wall Street Journal.
President Trump has said he was aware of the supposed deal.
#JohnCarl
#Fatihcoşar
#Robertkiyosaki
#xmucan
#DelistingAlert
1
45
سجّل الدخول لاستكشاف المزيد من المُحتوى
انضم إلى مُستخدمي العملات الرقمية حول العالم على Binance Square
⚡️ احصل على أحدث المعلومات المفيدة عن العملات الرقمية.
💬 موثوقة من قبل أكبر منصّة لتداول العملات الرقمية في العالم.
👍 اكتشف الرؤى الحقيقية من صنّاع المُحتوى الموثوقين.
البريد الإلكتروني / رقم الهاتف
المواضيع الرائجة
1
#CFTC&SECStrengthenOversightCollaborationOnPredictionMarkets
36,554 مشاهدات
508 يقومون بالنقاش
2
#StrategyBTCSalesLimitedToDividends
145,670 مشاهدات
1,729 يقومون بالنقاش
3
#BlackRockPlansMoneyMarketFundsforStablecoinUsers
949,347 مشاهدات
6,067 يقومون بالنقاش
4
#a16zCryptoSaysRWATops$30B
60,462 مشاهدات
432 يقومون بالنقاش
5
#CLARITYActHearingSetforMay14
609,479 مشاهدات
4,398 يقومون بالنقاش
6
cn|#Arthur Hayes称99%山寨币或归零
71,826 مشاهدات
15 يقومون بالنقاش
7
en|#ArthurHayesSays99%ofAltcoinsMayGotoZero
5,346 مشاهدات
19 يقومون بالنقاش
8
#USAdds115kJobs
837,309 مشاهدات
6,357 يقومون بالنقاش
9
#CathieWoodandCZDiscussAIandStablecoins
1.1M مشاهدات
7,388 يقومون بالنقاش
10
#TomLeeonBitMineSlowingETHPurchases
539,822 مشاهدات
5,039 يقومون بالنقاش