The more you think about complex applications in the agentic world, the less the single‑agent metaphor holds. A realistic product might be a swarm of agents: one talking to users, another handling payments, another managing risk limits, another syncing with external APIs. From the outside it looks like one service. Under the hood, it’s a small society. That raises an awkward question: who is responsible for what, and how do we tell? If each of those agents is just an address with some code, the answer is nobody knows. You might have a vague sense that the same dev team deployed them, but there’s no structured representation of their roles, owners, or boundaries. The Agent Registry gives you a way to describe those relationships with more precision. You can have multiple agents all anchored to the same Concordium account, or even encode a hierarchy where one supervising agent is explicitly responsible for others, all linked back to a common owner. This doesn’t magically solve organisational complexity, but it does mean that when something goes wrong, you’re not staring at a soup of addresses with no semantics. You can see which components are badged, which aren’t, which share an owner, and which fall under a particular entity’s responsibility. If you ever needed to unwind a disaster or satisfy a regulator, that mapping is invaluable. Without it, you’re left hand‑waving about the product, which doesn’t exist on‑chain as a coherent thing. Concordium’s role here is simply to store and serve that mapping. It doesn’t force a particular architecture on product teams, and it doesn’t micromanage how multi‑agent systems behave. But it does give you the primitives to treat this cluster of agents, across these chains, forms one product under one accountable owner as a first‑class fact, rather than a marketing claim. In a world of increasingly autonomous swarms, that level of clarity is going to be the difference $CCD #Agents# #AI# #DeFi