@NewtonProtocol There's something I keep coming back to about how Newton records attestations not just that a transaction was allowed or blocked but that the check itself happened and what it found.
Most onchain records tell you what moved. A transfer occurred a contract executed a balance changed.
The attestation sits one step earlier than that. It says this transaction was evaluated these conditions were checked and here is what that determination produced.
I find myself thinking about what that changes for the people who need to understand what happened after the fact.
Not to reverse anything just to know whether the rules were actually applied or whether something slipped through without being looked at properly.
The receipt doesn't guarantee the rules were right. It guarantees they were run. That's a smaller claim than it sounds at first, but it's also a more honest one.
A system that promises a verifiable record of every decision it made feels more trustworthy than one promising perfect outcomes even if it's less dramatic.
#Newt $NEWT
Most onchain records tell you what moved. A transfer occurred a contract executed a balance changed.
The attestation sits one step earlier than that. It says this transaction was evaluated these conditions were checked and here is what that determination produced.
I find myself thinking about what that changes for the people who need to understand what happened after the fact.
Not to reverse anything just to know whether the rules were actually applied or whether something slipped through without being looked at properly.
The receipt doesn't guarantee the rules were right. It guarantees they were run. That's a smaller claim than it sounds at first, but it's also a more honest one.
A system that promises a verifiable record of every decision it made feels more trustworthy than one promising perfect outcomes even if it's less dramatic.
#Newt $NEWT