When you mention "execution inefficiencies" and "latency" quietly extracting value — is this mostly affecting traders doing high frequency stuff? Or does it impact normal buyers/sellers too without them realizing?

As $FOGO trades near the $0.028 level, attention is slowly shifting from short-term price movement to the structural forces shaping its market behavior. Price targets will always attract speculation, but what’s increasingly driving conviction around Fogo is not momentum alone. It’s the realization that a significant portion of onchain losses across the industry stem from infrastructure design, not market direction.
Most traders tend to think in terms of price risk. In reality, a large share of capital erosion on-chain comes from execution inefficiencies embedded directly into protocol architecture. Latency, non-deterministic ordering, and operational friction quietly extract value from participants, often without being recognized as a systemic issue.

@Fogo Official approaches these problems at the design level. Deterministic 40 millisecond block times sharply reduce execution risk by narrowing the window in which prices can move between intent and settlement. Trades execute closer to their expected outcome, minimizing mark-to-market drift that typically arises from slower or inconsistent block production.
Counterparty and MEV-related risks are also addressed structurally. On many networks, non-deterministic transaction ordering enables persistent value transfer from traders to validators. This dynamic is not incidental; it is an emergent property of protocol design. Fogo’s architecture, combined with the upcoming Ambient deployment using dual-flow batch auctions, removes this advantage by neutralizing front-running opportunities rather than attempting to mitigate them after the fact.
Operational constraints represent another limiting factor for advanced strategies. Gas price unpredictability, repeated signature requirements, and manual intervention points disrupt automation and restrict what can be deployed on-chain. Fogo Sessions introduce scoped permissions and abstract gas costs away from the user, enabling continuous, programmatic execution without constant human involvement.
What distinguishes #Fogo in this context is that these decisions are not aspirational. They are live on mainnet. The network has already committed to a model where execution quality, fairness, and automation are treated as foundational requirements rather than optional enhancements.
As capital becomes increasingly sensitive to friction, especially from institutional and autonomous participants, infrastructure quality plays a larger role in asset valuation. Fogo’s growing relevance reflects a shift in focus from narrative-driven adoption to systems that measurably reduce structural loss. In that environment, market interest is less about short-term excitement and more about recognizing where capital can operate with fewer hidden costs.
{future}(FOGOUSDT)
{spot}(FOGOUSDT)