Let’s try to understand
Midnight’s Compact is interesting, but the real conversation starts after the “developer-friendly” label. If zk tools become easier to use, does that also make them easier to trust? How much of the path from code to circuit can ordinary developers actually verify? If something compiles, proves, and looks clean, how do teams know it is enforcing exactly what they intended? And if most users are trusting the toolchain more than they understand it, is that real confidence or just better packaging? Accessibility matters, no doubt. But in cryptographic systems, shouldn’t assurance matter even more than adoption?