Let’s try to understand
Lately I keep coming back to the same thought about SIGN: what exactly is holding trust together here? When verification happens, does it really settle anything, or does it just make people comfortable enough to move? At what point does “good enough for now” start replacing real confidence? And when a few voices begin to matter more than others, is that efficiency—or quiet centralization? I also wonder who benefits most when uncertainty becomes normal: the strongest contributors, or the people closest to key decisions? The more I look at SIGN, the more I feel the real story is not certainty, but how people learn to operate without it.