been going through Sign Protocol’s attestation flow and the you own your proofs idea sounds clean until you follow how an attestation actually gets created and used.

in SIGN, an attestor defines a schema, then signs a claim about you, and that gets stored on-chain or indexed with a UID. you hold that attestation, but the truth inside it is still assigned by the attestor

what’s easy to miss is how this drives token distribution. SIGN campaigns query specific schemas and attestors, so eligibility isn’t about your activity, it’s about whether the right entity attested you under the right structure

at first glance it feels like data sovereignty, but schema control and attestor selection quietly gate outcomes.

$SIGN #SignDigitalSovereignInfra @SignOfficial

$NOM $ONT

SIGN Next Move???