I'm not a token economist. But after 11 days of digging, here's what I understand about $SIGN:
1. It's not a "meme coin." It's infrastructure.
2. Revenue comes from three places:
• Protocol fees (people using Sign Protocol)
• Distribution fees (TokenTable takes a cut)
• Enterprise licenses (governments pay for SignPass)
3. More users = more fees = more value.
4. The team isn't dumping. Long-term vesting. Sequoia wouldn't back a quick flip.
The simple version:
$SIGN isn't speculation on "will this project exist?"
It's speculation on "will governments actually adopt this?"
What tokenomics question confuses you? Ask below.