The more I read Sign Protocol, the more I feel its real depth is not in creating proofs. It is in governing them well. A claim is not useful just because it carries a signature. It has to fit the right schema, come from an issuer with real authority, and still be valid in status, context, or revocation. Sign’s own docs make that clear: verification is a full process, not a quick stamp. That matters in a market now leaning harder into compliance, credentials, and reusable trust. Anyone can sign something. The harder question is who was allowed to say it, and under which rules. Honestly, that is where digital trust usually breaks, and why Sign feels more serious to me.

@SignOfficial #SignDigitalSovereignInfra $SIGN

SIGN

0.02859

-7.17%