@SignOfficial I used to think crypto removed trust.
Then I realized—it only removed trust from transactions, not from people.
A wallet can be anyone. A real user, a bot, or 100 fake identities.
And the system doesn’t care.
That’s where something like SIGN starts to make sense.
Not as a “feature”… but as a response to a gap.
It doesn’t try to control information.
It tries to shape behavior—by tying identity, credentials, and incentives together.
But that raises harder questions:
Do people actually want a persistent on-chain identity?
Can verification exist without sacrificing privacy?
And what happens when governance—not code—starts deciding what’s valid?
Maybe the goal was never to remove trust.
Maybe it was to redesign where it lives—and who controls it.
Still watching. Still unsure.
$SIGN @SignOfficial #SignDigitalSovereignInfra
