been going through Sign Protocol’s attestation framework since last night and honestly the ordering of priorities kept bothering me more than expected.

Sign Protocol is clearly optimizing for standardization first. every attestation is bound to a schema, stored on-chain or referenced through it, and verified against a trust registry before it can be used anywhere.

but the part that actually matters is who defines those schemas and who gets to issue against them. in SIGN, attestors anchor their keys in the registry, and verifiers rely on that registry to accept or reject credentials.

so users hold credentials in their wallets, but attestors decide what gets issued, and schemas decide what counts

the system is consistent, but consistency here comes from controlled structure, not open emergence.

#SignDigitalSovereignInfra @SignOfficial $SIGN

$NOM $D

SIGN Next Move???