Today, I found myself engaging in typical crypto behavior: seeing a bold "data" assertion, appreciating it, and nearly sharing it. I then inquired about where this number originated and who verified it. I didn't receive a response, so I ceased.
That's precisely why @OpenLedger is important to me. I desire a place where datasets and contributions have a distinct record, where it's standard to confirm before we promote, and where the community can reference sources instead of repeated screenshots.
If OPEN aims to recognize genuine contributions and truthful validation, it can steer the entire feed toward meaningful content rather than distractions. Brief question for those already diving into OpenLedger: which dataset would you prioritize for publishing, and what would give you confidence in another user's dataset?