Whenever I think of it, I wonder about something that sounds idiotic to me.
Is it technology construction or technology explanation?
In fact, when people are talking about AI, crypto, or onchain systems, it sometimes feels like two entirely different worlds. One group is talking about math, models, architecture, like it was maths. The other's voice is like the voice of these systems, and is a voice of life, community, status, identity.
The bizarre thing is I believe they're both referring to the same thing.
The first thing that comes to mind with $GENIUS and Genius Terminal is just how much of a communication issue crypto has become, rather than just a technological one. Privacy, information, execution, access. These things seem technical, but most people feel the emotion, then have to rationalize.
Perhaps the key, as is often said, is to "simplify the language.
Perhaps it's just concealing the machines below.
As systems grow more powerful, and explanations become shorter, what exactly are people taking on?
The fun part of the whole thing, is not if crypto gets mainstreamed.
It is whether or not people can still describe what they join when they join it.
#genius $GENIUS @GeniusOfficial
