OpenLedger's EVM move looks bullish... but is it hiding a bigger risk?
At first glance, EVM integration feels like a huge win. More developers, more tools, more liquidity.
But here's the question nobody is asking:
If every network starts following the same Ethereum playbook, what makes any of them truly different?
@OpenLedger was built with its own vision. EVM can accelerate adoption, but it can also pull projects toward the same standards, same tooling, and eventually the same identity.
Growth is important.
But preserving what makes a network unique is just as important.
The real challenge for OpenLedger isn't adding EVM.
It's making sure EVM doesn't become the reason people stop noticing what makes OpenLedger special.
What do you think - growth engine or identity trap?