Entry into BTCFi is priced as a sequence.

Wrap the BTC. Stake the wrap.

The token mints at the end of a chain where each step settles on its own.

Between steps the capital sits in a state no one designed for: half converted, still unsettled.

The market absorbs failed transactions and slippage into the habit and calls it the cost of access.

But the assumption underneath is older than the architecture.

Multi-step entry exists because early protocols were built in pieces, not because risk surfaces have to multiply with steps.

The entry that taught me this was someone else's: the wrap confirmed, the stake behind it stalled in congestion.

Bedrock treats the entry as a single object. Zap-in collapses the path from BTC to uniBTC into one transaction.

No intermediate state.

No window where capital is neither asset nor position.

The minting logic Bedrock runs inside PoSL carries the sequence atomically, so the entry either completes or never starts.

The surfaces collapse into a single execution.

The question moves there with them.

The old sequence spread execution risk across steps.

The single path carries all of it at once.

If that transaction breaks on a congested chain, there is no halfway state left to recover from.
#Bedrock $BR @Bedrock