Something about the phrase "digital twin" kept pulling me back while reading through Twin.fun's architecture documentation for OpenGradient $OPG #OPG @OpenGradient . The word implies a personal replica — AI that mirrors your identity, something that belongs to you in a meaningful sense. But the creator documentation describes "digital twin" as a 16-byte on-chain, with metadata stored off-chain on Walrus, and ownership that defaults to whatever wallet buys first at zero supply if no pre-mapping exists. The primary creator benefit listed first isn't model control or training rights — it's revenue share on key trades via a FriendTech-style bonding curve. What you actually own is a fee-recipient position in a speculative access market. The AI itself, the intelligence layer, isn't described as something you train, configure, or hold in any custodial sense the docs can point to. I kept wondering whether the "personal" in personal AI refers to something architectural that isn't captured in the contract layer yet, or whether it's doing something else entirely.