Kite AI and the “Permission Problem” Nobody Talks About
The more I use AI tools, the more I realize the real bottleneck isn’t intelligence… it’s permission. An agent can plan a whole workflow perfectly, then it hits the same wall every time: “Now approve this. Now sign that. Now trust me with your wallet.” And that’s where most people (including me) pull back.
That’s why @KITE AI 中文 feels different. It’s built around one simple idea: if agents are going to act in the real economy, they need identity + boundaries by default. Not “one wallet, full access, hope for the best.” Kite’s layered identity model (user → agent → session) feels like the first design I’ve seen that matches how humans actually delegate responsibility. You stay the root authority, the agent gets a controlled role, and the session becomes a short-lived “work pass” with limits.
And honestly, that changes the vibe completely. Instead of trusting an agent’s behavior, you trust the fence you set: time windows, spending caps, allowed actions. If something goes wrong, the damage stays small and the trail stays clear. That’s the kind of infrastructure that can turn agent payments from a scary idea into something normal.
$KITE isn’t trying to be loud. It’s trying to make autonomy feel safe enough to use daily—and if the agent economy is real, this is the exact kind of foundation it’s going to need.