I keep looking at Bedrock from one simple holder problem: Bitcoin confidence is strong, but Bitcoin productivity is still messy. uniBTC and brBTC are not interesting to me because they promise yield; they are interesting because they try to organize where that yield comes from. If Bedrock 2.0 can route BTC capital across different strategies without forcing users to chase every protocol manually, then the real value is not only extra return. It is reducing confusion. Still, I would not treat this as risk-free. Any BTCFi layer has to earn trust through transparency, execution, and time. For me, $BR matters if it becomes the coordination layer behind productive BTC, not just another reward story that users can actually understand clearly.
