Rechtlicher Sieg: US-Bundesgericht weist alle Ansprüche gegen Binance in Antiterror-Klage ab

BjanMK · 2026-03-16T23:53:36.000Z

535 Kläger reichten eine Klage gegen Binance nach dem Antiterrorgesetz ein. Ein US-Bundesgericht wies jede einzelne Klage ab. Der Fall beinhaltete Anschuldigungen, dass Binance materielle Unterstützung für 64 terroristische Angriffe geleistet hat. Nach einer detaillierten rechtlichen Überprüfung gab das Gericht ein 62-seitiges Urteil heraus, das zu dem Schluss kam, dass die Ansprüche die rechtlichen Anforderungen nicht erfüllten, die notwendig sind, um fortzufahren. Dies war kein verfahrensrechtliches Ergebnis. Das Gericht prüfte den Inhalt der Anschuldigungen und stellte fest, dass sie es nicht schafften, eine Haftung nach dem Antiterrorgesetz zu begründen.

535 plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against Binance under the Anti-Terrorism Act.
A US federal court dismissed every single claim.
The case included allegations that Binance provided material support linked to 64 terrorist attacks. After a detailed legal review, the court issued a 62-page ruling concluding that the claims did not meet the legal requirements necessary to proceed.
This was not a procedural outcome. The court examined the substance of the allegations and determined that they failed to establish liability under the Anti-Terrorism Act.
What the Court FoundIn its analysis, the court addressed the core elements required under the ATA and concluded that the plaintiffs did not demonstrate that Binance:
assisted terrorists
associated with terrorist attacks
participated in or sought the success of such attacks
conspired with any terrorist organization
Because these elements were not established, all claims in the complaint were dismissed.
Understanding the Legal OutcomeUnder the Anti-Terrorism Act, liability requires a clear and direct connection between a defendant’s actions and terrorist activity. In this case, the court found that such a connection was not demonstrated.
The ruling represents a full dismissal based on a detailed review of both the allegations and the applicable legal standards.
Why This MattersThis decision highlights how courts evaluate claims involving digital asset platforms. Legal conclusions are based on evidence and statutory requirements.
The outcome reinforces that claims must meet a defined legal threshold in order to proceed under US law.
Binance’s ApproachThe result reflects Binance’s approach of addressing claims through the legal process. By contesting the allegations in court, the company obtained a full dismissal following judicial review.
What Comes NextPlaintiffs have been granted 60 days to file an amended complaint in line with a separate appellate ruling.
Final TakeawayA US federal court has dismissed all claims against Binance in this Anti-Terrorism Act case after a detailed legal review.
The court found that the allegations did not establish the elements required under US law, resulting in a full dismissal of the complaint.