🚨Stephen Miran – calls for >1% rate cuts in 2026
🚨Tom Barkin – stresses a “finely tuned” approach to rate moves, balancing inflation vs jobs as rates sit near neutral (Neutral )
🚨Michelle Bowman – warns the labor market is fragile and backs multiple 2026 rate cuts
If you think this article was useful - Like and Comment on future rate cut chances. Your opinion is the best "thank you".
Speeches Breakdown ⏬⏬⏬
_________________________________________________________________
Stephen Miran – Federal Reserve Governor (Fox Business interview)
Main Message
Miran continues to argue that U.S. monetary policy is still too restrictive and that the Federal Reserve could — and should — cut interest rates by more than a full percentage point (150 bps or more) this year to support growth and ease financial conditions. He says that while inflation remains above 2%, the underlying price pressures are not as threatening as headline figures suggest.
What He Focused On
Inflation Interpretation: He believes much of the measured inflation is due to temporary effects or measurement quirks, implying inflation is less entrenched than many officials think.
Policy Tightness: Described current policy as excessively restrictive, holding back the economy.
Rate Cuts: Advocated for significant rate cuts in 2026 — well over 100 bps — to bring policy into a more neutral stance.
Broader View: Miran has consistently pushed for lower rates relative to the rest of the Fed, reflecting more accommodative thinking.
Implications
Miran’s remarks are considered dovish relative to most other Fed officials, signaling he wants faster and more aggressive easing to stimulate the economy, even if inflation is only gradually retreating.
Tone: Dovish
Tom Barkin – President, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
Main Message
Barkin delivered a more cautious and balanced assessment of the economy. He emphasized that while some economic indicators are improving (like productivity), inflation remains above target and uncertainties still cloud the outlook.
What He Highlighted
Productivity Gains: Noted recent productivity improvements but stressed they may be temporary or inconsistent.
Inflation: Recognized inflation has eased from previous highs but remains materially above the Fed’s 2% goal, arguing it’s not yet time to commit to further cuts.
Economic Resilience: Acknowledged strong economic resilience aided by fiscal stimulus and demand, but with risks — especially if sectoral growth falters.
Uncertainty Remains: Warned future rate decisions should be data-dependent and carefully “fine-tuned” based on incoming evidence rather than pre-set targets.
Implications
Barkin’s speech leans neutral — neither pushing aggressively for cuts nor warning loudly against them. He frames the recovery as neither fragile nor robust enough for confident predictions.
Tone: Neutral
Michelle Bowman – Fed Governor
Michelle Bowman – What She Really Emphasized
In her public remarks tied to the Feb. 3 agenda, Bowman explained her decision to pause further rate cuts for now after recent reductions, while still supporting future easing later this year. She argued that:
The U.S. economy continues to grow, and inflation is moving closer to the 2% goal — especially once temporary tariff effects fade.
Labor market conditions remain fragile with softer hiring and lagging demand, posing a downside risk.
The key question now isn’t if cuts will happen, but when — and getting the timing right matters, so she wants to see more incoming data before acting.
Her internal forecasts still include several rate cuts over 2026, but she’s choosing to temporarily pause to evaluate new reports before implementing them.
She stressed monetary policy must stay data-dependent and not “on a preset path.”
Market Takeaway
Bowman is cautiously dovish — she supports cuts later this year but wants more clarity from data before cutting now. Her emphasis is on balancing inflation progress with labor market risk.
