The Strategic Supremacy of Position Sizing Over Entry Precision
In the current market environment, the primary focus for any disciplined investor should be on capital preservation and increasing USD cash allocations rather than hunting for the "perfect" entry.
Cash at this stage is not merely sitting on the sidelines; it acts as a strategic buffer that provides essential portfolio resilience and emotional control while the broader market trend remains ambiguous. Consequently, any deployment of funds must remain highly conservative. Dollar-cost averaging (DCA) into positions right now should not be viewed as a way to maximize short-term gains, but rather as a method to maintain a presence in the market and test price reactions while keeping the vast majority of capital in reserve.
A clear example of this philosophy can be seen in my current
$WLD perpetual position, which is currently trading at 0.3537 with a -13.33% change. Despite the chart offering several technically sound entry zones, I chose to keep the DCA size intentionally small.
As a result, even when the price reacted favorably to specific levels, the position was too small to materially improve the overall portfolio's performance. This highlights a crucial trading reality: a technically correct entry is largely ineffective if the position size is insufficient. However, this is a deliberate trade-off where preserving cash takes priority over forcing an impact.
Each DCA order serves as a probe to gauge market strength rather than a performance driver. Ultimately, success at this stage isn't about catching the absolute bottom; it is about retaining enough capital so that when conditions finally align, the portfolio has the full power to truly reposition and capitalize on the shift.
#RiskManagement #WLD #CryptoStrategy #DCA #BearMarketAlpha @rmj_trades