I used to think recording activity was enough for systems to function properly.
If everything is stored, you can always go back and use it later.
But the real issue shows up after that.
Stored data still needs to be understood again.
Every time a system revisits an action, it has to ask what it means, whether it matters, and how it should be used. The data is there—but the understanding isn’t.
That’s where SIGN feels different.
It focuses on keeping meaning attached to activity, so systems don’t just retrieve information—they recognize it.
Because once recognition replaces reinterpretation…
systems stop circling around the same questions, and start moving forward with clarity.