I used to think systems stay flexible because they can interpret things differently.
But over time, that flexibility starts turning into inconsistency.
The same action means one thing here, something else there—and users end up navigating interpretations instead of outcomes.
That’s where SIGN feels different.
It doesn’t remove flexibility, but it reduces how often systems need to reinterpret the same signal.
Meaning gets defined once… and then reused.
So systems don’t keep asking “what does this mean?” again and again.
They already know.
And when that happens, coordination stops depending on interpretation…
and starts depending on shared clarity.