I keep noticing something simple.
People don’t usually question outcomes.
If something works…
they accept it.
They don’t always look at
how it was verified.
Or how it was proven.
They just trust the result.
And move on.
That’s what makes this interesting.
Because $SIGN focuses on
making the process verifiable.
Structured.
Traceable.
But most people don’t spend time
looking at the process.
They look at what comes out of it.
So even if verification improves,
it doesn’t automatically mean
people will pay attention to it.
At least not right away.
Because behavior is simple.
If the outcome looks fine,
it gets trusted.
No extra step.
So it leaves a question.
Does improving the process
actually change how people trust…
or do people only notice
when the outcome fails?
I’m not sure yet.