My initial understanding of this space was that when something was stored on chain then trust was achieved. It must be valid right because it must be there. However, the more I stared the more I understood that it is not the question of storage but rather the question of who makes the determination and delivers the trust.
The same trends can be observed in such projects as $LINK , $ARB or even identity driven plays. All of them deal with parts of the puzzle, data feeds, scaling and access. But SIGN takes a different approach to it. It is concerned with organized attestations or the meaning is spelled out issued and managed over time. Not only is there evidence but evidence remains valid or lapses and becomes revoked. That is a more encompassing lifecycle.
However, in that structure one thing remains. The system slowly depends on its issuers. It is possible to price the narrative in the markets grab attention in the form of tokens but to be truly trusted it is necessary to who is authorized to say and to what degree it is dispersed? That is what I will be closely observing not only SIGN but the whole infra layer.
@SignOfficial #SignDigitalSovereignInfra $SIGN
