I keep circling back to this one thought… everyone keeps saying “programmable money” like it’s already real. But is it really… or just a clean idea on paper?
Before all this, money was simple. Sent from point A to B. After that? kinda a black box. You just hoped it reached the right hands and got used the right way.
What @SignOfficial is hinting at feels different. They’re not just moving money… they’re trying to attach logic to it. Like, not just who gets paid, but why and when. Sounds powerful, yeah. But also messy.
Say someone claims a subsidy. Now it’s not just ID… it’s proofs, activity, maybe even behavior. And payment only unlocks after verification. That’s a big shift.
But then I get stuck again… who verifies the verifier?
Because if that layer is weak or biased, we’re just rebuilding the same trust problem, just dressed nicer.
Idea is strong tho. Execution… that’s where things usually break.