Land in Pixels isn't just a place to farm. It's an argument about token value, and I wanted to understand if the argument holds. Here's the structure. Players own land plots as NFTs on Ronin. Other players farm those plots and a cut flows to the landowner in PIXEL. Demand for land drives demand for the token. The logic is circular in a way that should make you pause before accepting it.
What makes it more interesting than a simple circular argument is that the land actually does something. Productivity is real. Earnings are real. The value isn't purely speculative, it's partially backed by in-game activity. Partially. That word is doing a lot of work in that sentence and I think most land buyers underestimate it.