Siren Coin $SIREN is often predicted to follow the same "RAVE strategy" because both projects utilize a market manipulation playbook centered on extreme supply concentration and short-squeeze mechanics. In the current 2026 market cycle, both coins are characterized by having roughly 88–90% of their total supply controlled by a few wallet clusters (or "main players"), which allows for a highly illiquid "float." By keeping the available supply low and maintaining high visibility through trending narratives - AI for Siren and Web3 entertainment for $RAVE - these projects attract a high volume of short sellers in the perpetual markets.
The core of the strategy involves driving funding rates into extreme negative territory, forcing those short sellers to pay massive premiums to stay in their positions. When a positive catalyst is then "timed" by the operators, the resulting price pump triggers a violent short squeeze, where liquidated shorts are forced to buy back the token, further accelerating the upward spike. Essentially, Siren is expected to replicate RAVE's success by weaponizing its concentrated supply to trap retail traders in "mechanical paradoxes" that generate massive profits for the project’s main controllers.
What's your take - do you think the AI utility behind Siren will eventually give it more staying power than RAVE, or is it purely a game of market mechanics?
