most AI platforms turn users into activity long before users ever share in the value
thats why OPEN’s allocation structure made me pause almost instantly
51.71% community 18.29% investors 15% team
sounds generous on paper and honestly it is but the more i looked at it the more another question started feeling bigger
because “community” never really means one group
builders contributors validators stakers normal users people quietly feeding activity into the network every day
and in most systems the top 10% of wallets still end up capturing most of the rewards underneath anyway
not always because they created the most value sometimes they just understood the mechanism faster than everyone else
and thats the part i keep thinking about here
the real challenge may not be allocating 51.71% to the community
it may be making sure the system doesnt quietly redirect most of that value back toward the same small group again
because once networks scale distribution mechanics start mattering just as much as the allocation itself
same 51.71% same community allocation completely different outcome underneath because eventually the question stops being
“how big is the community allocation?”
and becomes
“does the value actually reach the community?”
Same 51.71% on paper.
But once the network gets bigger… does that value actually keep reaching people — or does most of it slowly end up back in the same wallets again?