#bedrock $BR @Bedrock im noticing that Not due to yield.Not due to result of restaking.

Because it subtly contradicts one of the earliest presumptions in cryptocurrency.

the notion that participation and conviction need to be distinct.

Something different is suggested by protocols such as uniBTC.

Perhaps capital can continue to be active and committed.

Perhaps ownership doesn't have to equate to passivity.

Assets that can support an ecosystem without compelling holders to give up their long-term convictions may hold the key to the future.

That, in my opinion, is the actual experiment taking place here.

Bitcoin owners are not being asked to give up waiting by Bedrock.

It raises the question of whether their capital should only be used for waiting.

To be honest, that's a far more significant question than APY.

observed a peculiarity among Bitcoin users.

The majority of people believe that their greatest strength is patience.

And historically, they were correct.

Purchase Bitcoin.

Disregard the noise.

Keep waiting longer than the others.

That tactic produced enormous wealth.

However, every effective tactic eventually results in a blind spot.

This is the blind spot:

What if there is a price for waiting?

not a risk to the market.

not fluctuations.

Possibility.

Bitcoin owners used their gains as a gauge of performance for many years.

Few quantified what they failed to measure.

I was drawn to Bedrock because of this.