LOOK deeper… this is where burn narratives separate hype from structure 🔥🧠
is being marketed as a “burning giant,” and on the surface, aggressive yearly burns sound powerful. But the real question isn’t how much gets burned — it’s what remains and why demand should grow. Even after continuous burns, supply staying massive means price appreciation still depends on adoption, liquidity, and sustained attention, not burn mechanics alone 📊
Burns can create scarcity, yes — but only when paired with real momentum drivers like community growth, listings, and long-term relevance. Without those, burns become a slow drip of excitement that fades once the narrative cools ⚠️
Smart traders don’t fall in love with projections or far-off price predictions. They watch execution, transparency, and how the market reacts over time. If demand expands faster than supply shrinks, that’s when things get interesting 🚀
🔥 burns shape supply, not destiny
🧠 demand decides value
⚖️ structure always beats promises