vanar

Log in to ward at 8 PM, the threshold is 231 points, guessed correctly, but unfortunately, I can only grab the second tier, only able to take what's left, with 50,000 portions, the minimum estimate to grab is 216 points, looking at whether the value is worth eating, currently valued at 40U.

On February 6th, there will be an opn booster event and tge, remember to participate, Da Mao, it might be around 150u.

Today, I chose wmtx for points, still quite tight, spent 7U for 1w6, crying, skipped a meal at KFC, the owl competition threshold has reached 150,000, but the tokens are only worth 10u, a big loss in this competition, still quite tight.
The creator task platform ranking has been updated, Vanry is still ranked over 200, with only 100 spots available, it's really hard to get in, but still holding on, hoping to achieve good results, just posting articles every day, I think you can make it to the top 100. 😃

One of the most interesting recent updates is that @Vanarchain brought in a new Head of Payments Infrastructure with decades of experience in traditional finance and payment rails. That’s not a flashy announcement, but it matters. A lot. You don’t hire someone with deep Worldpay and FIS background unless you’re serious about plugging blockchain into real payment flows, not just DeFi experiments.

That lines up well with Vanar’s broader direction. The chain has been positioning itself as AI-native financial infrastructure, not just another EVM clone. Yes, it’s EVM-compatible, so developers can still use Solidity and familiar tools. But the difference is how Vanar treats data.
Instead of storing information as static blobs and letting off-chain systems do the thinking, Vanar’s Neutron layer turns data into semantic objects that AI systems can actually reason over. That’s a big deal for things like automated payments, compliance logic, and financial workflows that change based on context.

From a market perspective, $VANRY is still very much early. It’s trading around the low-cent range with a relatively small market cap and modest daily volume. Translation: volatility is real, liquidity isn’t deep yet, and this isn’t something institutions are piling into today. That’s the risk side.
But the flip side is that the market clearly hasn’t priced in long-term adoption yet either.

What I like is where the team is spending its energy. Instead of chasing short-term hype, Vanar’s 2026 roadmap leans into infrastructure upgrades, intelligent automation, and actual utility. Less noise. More building. That usually doesn’t pump price fast, but it’s how serious platforms get created.
If you compare Vanar to other Layer 1s, the positioning becomes clearer. Ethereum is about settlement and security. Solana is about speed and scale. Vanar is carving out a niche around intelligent execution on-chain systems that can adapt, reason, and automate without relying heavily on off-chain middleware.

Of course, there are real challenges. AI-native blockchains come with a learning curve. Developers need time to understand what’s possible. And #vanar still needs shipped applications to prove this isn’t just architectural ambition.
But recent moves suggest the team is thinking long-term. Payments leadership. Infrastructure focus. Practical AI tooling.

That’s why Vanar feels less like a speculative narrative and more like a chain quietly preparing for where Web3 is actually heading. Not loud. Just deliberate.

Brothers, good evening! Today is February 5th, and it's time for our review.
Regarding the recent market situation, to be honest, it's really hard to endure. Many brothers have been asking me in the background: 'Why has Alpha been so difficult to work with recently?' 'Should we adjust our strategy?'
In today's practical report, I will explain everything clearly.
The harsh truth of the Alpha track: the retreat behind the prosperity.
Everyone, look at the data, Alpha has held steady over the 200,000 mark for 18 consecutive days. On the surface, the enthusiasm does not diminish, but my personal feeling is: the data is deceiving, and the studio is retreating.

There is an old man repairing bicycles at the entrance of my neighborhood downstairs, and he has been doing it for more than twenty years. A few days ago, I went to fix a flat tire, 5 yuan. He pulled out his phone for me to scan, and after I finished scanning, he sighed: “It’s 4.6 yuan, and I’m taking away 0.4 yuan.”

0.4 yuan. I didn’t say anything. But I was thinking, this old man repairs twenty tires a day, and in a month, he has lost more than 200 yuan to this invisible pipeline. He doesn’t know where this money goes, nor has anyone explained to him the concept of 'payment channel fees.' He just vaguely feels that digitization has cost him something.

This incident made me understand that @Vanarchain is right here.

Last week, I helped a friend fix an old bicycle. The bike looked shiny, the frame was made of carbon fiber, the tires were from a famous brand, and the brake system looked high-end. But once I rode it, the chain got stuck because it was missing a small bearing. As a result, the whole bike wobbled, and I couldn't ride more than two kilometers before I had to stop and push it. I angrily ran to the hardware store and spent five bucks on a bearing. After installing it, the bike was smooth and could run like the wind. This incident reminded me of the current AI crypto landscape.
You see, those big shots brag every day on Twitter about how AI is changing the world. Like Marc Andreessen's a16z, talking about AI solving the population crisis, it sounds like a sci-fi blockbuster; Fetch.ai's agent collaboration paints a beautiful picture of little AI robots helping each other. These are all glamorous frames and tires, looking impressive, causing investors to experience FOMO as soon as they hear about it. But the problem is, beneath these grand narratives, when AI actually lands, it always seems to be missing one or two key little components. Just like my bicycle, without the bearing, everything is in vain. AI can chat and generate images, which is impressive for a moment, but when it needs to work continuously—for instance, managing your crypto assets for a month, executing trades, verifying data—it exposes its flaws. The next day it forgets the last instruction, and on the third day, it goes on strike because the data source is unreliable. This is not intelligence; it’s a flash in the pan.

Just half an hour before writing this article, I was staring at the on-chain record of a 3000 USDT transfer, my hands trembling a bit.
Even after 30 years of crawling and rolling in this circle, considering myself a veteran who has seen all kinds of storms, I actually capsized in an inconspicuous chain game interaction. It wasn't some advanced hacking technique, just a well-disguised phishing authorization signature. The moment I clicked 'confirm' to buy an item in the game, my U was gone.
Anger, frustration, but more importantly, a profound sense of fatigue.