Caldera's "Moral Controversy": Does $ERA Incentive Induce Speculative Behavior? Caldera promotes ecological self-enhancement through $ERA incentives for nodes and developers, but does it induce speculative behavior? In 2025, the price of $ERA is $0.34, with a market cap of $2 billion, and Metalayer supports over 100 chains with a TVL exceeding $500 million. @jmhuolongguo
On X, it is stated that the ERA Force community rewards early holders, with the TGE launching on Binance and Coinbase, but the 20% drop of $ERA in a year has raised moral concerns. Metalayer integrates the XPLA gaming ecosystem through Chainlink CCIP, with transaction costs of $0.00001, allowing developers to deploy low-latency L3. In 2024, financing supports RaaS, handling 1 billion transactions, but 70% of staking rewards go to large holders. @Calderaxyz
There is a need for transparency in incentive distribution, $ERA promotes Rollup interconnection, but speculative controversies may shake community trust #caldera
On X, it is stated that the ERA Force community rewards early holders, with the TGE launching on Binance and Coinbase, but the 20% drop of $ERA in a year has raised moral concerns. Metalayer integrates the XPLA gaming ecosystem through Chainlink CCIP, with transaction costs of $0.00001, allowing developers to deploy low-latency L3. In 2024, financing supports RaaS, handling 1 billion transactions, but 70% of staking rewards go to large holders. @Calderaxyz
There is a need for transparency in incentive distribution, $ERA promotes Rollup interconnection, but speculative controversies may shake community trust #caldera