In the AI era, it's not AI that's replacing people; it's those "unwilling to evolve" that are getting left behind.
A few days ago, I was chatting with a buddy from an exchange, and he mentioned that there are still a lot of folks in his company who "can't use AI." But upon closer inspection, it’s not that they can’t; it’s that they refuse to accept it— the AI era is already here.
After we launched on OpenClaw, we quickly "optimized" a lot of those who were resistant to changing their way of working. It’s not that the company is ruthless; it’s just that the market is even more ruthless.
I came across a saying that really hit home: AI has lowered the technical barrier, allowing those who couldn't do things before to now create value with AI.
Yet, there are still many people grumbling: "Why is AI replacing regular jobs first? Shouldn't it tackle the high-risk jobs first?"
This victim mentality essentially reveals that their mindset hasn’t evolved.
When Jensen Huang was asked by a student, "Will AI take away jobs from lawyers and accountants?" he bluntly replied: Every job will.
Will using AI make you lazier?
No, it’ll just make you busier.
Busy creating more value, busy doing those high-level tasks you didn’t have time for before, busy leveraging AI as your multiplier.
Many folks are reluctant to learn, and their excuses sound clever: "AI is updating all the time, so what’s the point of learning?"
Translated, that means—lazy, unwilling to try new things.
These days, many companies are providing employees with real opportunities to learn models, create products, and generate content, which in the past would have required personal investment of time and money to gain experience through trial and error.
The company is putting opportunities right in front of you; if you’re not hustling to learn, what are you doing?
The AI era is indeed brutal, but it’s also unprecedentedly fair:
In the past, it was about background, education, and resources; now it’s about willingness to learn and execution.
Those willing to evolve will see AI as a super amplifier;
Those unwilling to evolve will find themselves outpaced by ordinary people who are eager to use AI.
Bottom line: the times won’t wait for anyone.
A few days ago, I was chatting with a buddy from an exchange, and he mentioned that there are still a lot of folks in his company who "can't use AI." But upon closer inspection, it’s not that they can’t; it’s that they refuse to accept it— the AI era is already here.
After we launched on OpenClaw, we quickly "optimized" a lot of those who were resistant to changing their way of working. It’s not that the company is ruthless; it’s just that the market is even more ruthless.
I came across a saying that really hit home: AI has lowered the technical barrier, allowing those who couldn't do things before to now create value with AI.
Yet, there are still many people grumbling: "Why is AI replacing regular jobs first? Shouldn't it tackle the high-risk jobs first?"
This victim mentality essentially reveals that their mindset hasn’t evolved.
When Jensen Huang was asked by a student, "Will AI take away jobs from lawyers and accountants?" he bluntly replied: Every job will.
Will using AI make you lazier?
No, it’ll just make you busier.
Busy creating more value, busy doing those high-level tasks you didn’t have time for before, busy leveraging AI as your multiplier.
Many folks are reluctant to learn, and their excuses sound clever: "AI is updating all the time, so what’s the point of learning?"
Translated, that means—lazy, unwilling to try new things.
These days, many companies are providing employees with real opportunities to learn models, create products, and generate content, which in the past would have required personal investment of time and money to gain experience through trial and error.
The company is putting opportunities right in front of you; if you’re not hustling to learn, what are you doing?
The AI era is indeed brutal, but it’s also unprecedentedly fair:
In the past, it was about background, education, and resources; now it’s about willingness to learn and execution.
Those willing to evolve will see AI as a super amplifier;
Those unwilling to evolve will find themselves outpaced by ordinary people who are eager to use AI.
Bottom line: the times won’t wait for anyone.