Hello everyone, I am Sour Jujube.
What everyone thinks about scaling is:
TPS Higher
Gas Lower
Faster Speed
But these are too 'coarse'.
True scaling is not about making 'big',
but about making 'detailed'.
Fine structure, fine governance, fine parameters, fine experience, fine toolchain.
Linea is doing this.
It is not about expanding ETH's 'capacity',
but about expanding ETH's 'fineness'.
① The problem with ETH is not 'big', but 'not detailed enough'
ETH's design is too macro:
Single Layer Governance
Single Layer Execution
Single Layer Gas
Single Layer Experience
Single Layer Consensus
Everything is too large.
What Linea is doing is:
Break ETH into finer-grained experience modules.
Finer execution layer
Finer cost structure
Finer tool experience
Finer governance rhythm
Finer ecological interface
This is real scaling.
The details of Linea are done very 'engineer-like exquisite.'
For example:
Log output is cleaner than the mainnet.
Error messages are more clear.
Debugging environment is closer to production
On-chain data structures are more consistent.
The toolchain has no compatibility traps.
Cross-chain bridge UX is more stable than most bridges.
These things are not 'performance parameters.'
It is user experience.
Also a place where a toolchain can showcase its skills.
The future of L2 is not a performance battle, but 'whose details resemble an upgraded version of Ethereum more.'
The route of Linea is:
Rather than being faster, it is better to be finer.
Rather than updating, it is better to be more stable.
Rather than being more complex, it is better to be more elegant.
This route will make it become:
An advanced version of Ethereum, not a replacement for Ethereum.
Doing fine requires extremely strong long-termism.
Growing big is easy.
Detailing is difficult.
Detailing means:
Not a one-time effort
But a long-term accumulation
Requires a lot of developer feedback
Needs continuous polishing of the most inconspicuous parts
This is the least pleasing route for users.
But it is the route most cherished by developers.
Linea has chosen a harder but more correct direction.
Details determine fate, and Linea's future will outperform others with 'details compounding.'
Not relying on:
Incentives
Airdrop
Marketing
Narrative
Show off skills
Joint battle
TVL competition
What it relies on:
Fine tools
Fine experience
Fine governance
Fine route
Fine user links
Fine technical implementation
Fine documentation
This is long-term evolutionary power.
The ecosystem will be attracted by the 'credibility of details.'
What do you think are the most easily overlooked yet most important on-chain details? Logs, toolchains, bridges, governance, or development experience?
