We are simply not on the same level of understanding. 'Not awakening is destiny.' Seeing this phrase from a certain someone makes me want to laugh. I feel that it's not the audience's lack of insight, but rather you have turned trading into an obscure mysticism, using 'awakening' as a cover for your ambiguity and reluctance to provide clear answers.
The trading market has never relied on vague rhetoric but rather on solid price points, verifiable strategies, and results that can be reviewed.
You say that others do not understand trading if they haven't finished reading the trading books, yet you yourself are afraid to clearly state specific price ranges, always being ambiguous. When you're right, you say it's the enlightenment you received; when you're wrong, you attribute it to the audience's 'destiny of never awakening.' This is not a trading sharing; it's clearly playing a word game of 'never being wrong.'
Still use compassion to observe the world and use cause and effect to discuss the market? It sounds profound, but in reality, it's a way to avoid the core issues. The public's perspective is clear; look at how many support you in the comment section. If you're wrong, it's because your understanding isn't deep enough; if you're right, it's because he pointed it out. Isn't this just putting yourself on the pedestal of the 'ever-profitable blogger' and using the empty 'theory of understanding' to avoid validation?
