“Translate, what is surprise?”
In DeFi, surprise shouldn't be “earned by luck,” but rather: being able to clearly explain and calculate risks and returns without constantly monitoring or manually crafting strategies.
What I understand about Lorenzo Protocol is that it is doing this: moving the “asset management logic” that originally only belonged to institutions onto the chain—packaging strategies into more user-friendly products (like OTFs: on-chain tradable funds/portfolios), allowing ordinary users to obtain exposure to a basket of assets/strategies as if they were buying “shares,” instead of constantly switching positions in dozens of pools and being driven by emotions.
More importantly, it is also trying to introduce BTC liquidity and returns into the on-chain world more smoothly: not making you “beg for hot spots” but rather bringing efficiency, transparency, and composability back to the forefront as much as possible—standing up to earn returns.
As for $BANK, I prefer to understand it as a “steering wheel”: binding governance, incentives, and long-term interests at the same table, allowing this on-chain asset management system to become more stable over time, rather than just a fleeting trend.
What would you prefer to do with Lorenzo Protocol: one-click to obtain portfolio returns, or focus on on-chain return opportunities around BTC?
