#加密市场观察
Let's talk about $GIGGLE and #Max , this matter has become increasingly interesting recently.
First, there’s @CZ , what is he fully engaged in after stepping down? It is Giggle Academy, providing free education to children worldwide. This is his core vision, a very clear target.
Did you notice? Now, Giggle's official Twitter almost always retweets the charitable landing posts of @Max Charity . Not to mention, even CZ himself has personally joined in retweeting, with content detailing their specific implementations around the globe: donating equipment, building learning corners, training users...
This directly presents the market with a clear logic:
$GIGGLE: On-chain, through a transaction tax mechanism, responsible for "creating fuel"—raising sustainable funds for free education.
#Max: Offline, as a global execution network, responsible for "igniting the engine"—turning funds into real equipment, courses, and user growth.
Every retweet from the official account and CZ is a credit endorsement and process audit for this "on-chain funds → offline results" closed loop.
So, those still saying “charity is a gimmick” can take a break. Charity here is not just a slogan, but a verifiable, supervised execution system. Behind every retweet are real locations, children, data, photos, and videos.
This means that what binds Giggle and Max is a consensus of "pragmatic action." CZ's vision of “global free education” is becoming clearer, credible, and irreversible through this actionable initiative.
Each retweet from the official account is a confirmation and acceptance. Perhaps this makes us ponder: the long-term value of a crypto project, apart from the financial model, lies in whether it can, like this, form a complete ecosystem with a vision, funding, and execution?
When charity is no longer just a slogan, but a series of publicly witnessed, community-driven practical actions, does the entire narrative thus carry a different weight?
