The stablecoin sector may appear to be about whether it is 'anchored' or not, but in essence, it is a long-term competition of 'transparency + risk control + scenario coverage'. Today, while studying @USDD - Decentralized USD , I am more concerned about whether USDD can create a mechanism that is replicable, rather than relying on the heat of short-term activities to support confidence. The most critical moments for stablecoins are never during calm market conditions, but during severe market fluctuations, liquidity contractions, and emotional spreads—at this time, users only care about two things: whether the peg can be maintained, and whether it can circulate smoothly.

From a usage perspective, stablecoins serve as the foundation for on-chain capital turnover: cross-chain arbitrage, market making, contract margin, and DeFi collateralized lending all rely on it. If a stablecoin has sufficient depth, low friction, and broad ecological coverage, it will naturally become the 'default tool'. I hope to see USDD continuously strengthen in two areas: first, more continuous and standardized information disclosure, allowing users to reconcile accounts long-term through on-chain data; second, more real-world scenarios implemented (DeFi collateralization, trading pairs, cross-chain turnover, payment gateways), making 'stability' a habit rather than a slogan. I will continue to track the adoption and mechanism details. #USDD以稳见信 @USDD - Decentralized USD