An intuitive question: What will happen if most future on-chain transactions are not initiated by humans?
Many people are still viewing AI from a 'human' perspective.
But the reality is—AI has already started making decisions, executing strategies, and scheduling resources for people, and the next step must be:
👉 AI participating in economic activities itself.
The question arises:
What identity does AI use?
Whose wallet does it use?
How does it settle, collaborate, and constrain itself?
This is exactly why Kite exists.
Kite is not about 'AI applications,' but a public economic chain prepared for AI.
On Kite, AI Agents possess native on-chain identity, independent accounts, and automated payment capabilities.
They can:
Take tasks themselves
Call services themselves
Complete settlements themselves
Without needing manual authorization for each transaction and not relying on Web2 payment systems.
In short: For the first time, AI can truly 'run its own business.'
Why is this direction often underestimated?
Because most on-chain behaviors still come from humans.
But once AI starts executing tasks on a large scale, transaction frequency and collaboration complexity will increase exponentially.
By then:
General public chains will appear bloated
Human wallet models will become inefficient
And Kite has been designed from the beginning as 'non-human participants.'
The market typically realizes these changes a step late.
By the time everyone discusses 'AI economic scale,'
The underlying has often already been priced.
Kite is currently in a typical stage:
The concept is established, but most people have not truly figured out what it is solving.
And moments like this often mark the very beginning of a trend.
If you agree with one judgment:
In the future, it's not just humans trading on-chain, but AI operating.
Then Kite is likely not just a passing name.
