30 minutes ago the top spot was still $NIL , now it’s $VELVET . The truly abnormal point isn’t the 94.1% gain in price—it’s that the position size is still being increased.

You can verify the signal with just one metric: the 1-hour change in OI goes from -1.2% to +3.2%.

This indicates that the funds from the previous top spot are cooling off, while in $VELVET there is still new capital entering—this isn’t just a price pump from spot buying.

The funding structure also shows a contrast.

The funding rate moves from -0.0075% to +0.0663%, meaning the market has switched from paying shorts to paying longs; the cost of chasing has already risen noticeably.

In the long/short positioning breakdown, the retail long share drops from 46% to 31%, suggesting that it’s not that retail traders are unanimously bullish on the surface. Instead, it looks more like after the price surge, shorts are still actively resisting in the market.

The invalidation condition is simple.

If OI starts to fall, and meanwhile the price drops back below the intraday high at 1.4969 and can’t get close to the highs again, then this “add-on-the-way-up” signal will turn into a “distribution at the highs” signal.

If OI continues to increase but the price no longer makes new highs, the risk shifts from a squeeze to overcrowded longs.

$VELVET $NIL #合约异动 # funding rate

Compiled with assistance from Claude Fable 5, for informational purposes only—please verify independently.