In Alpha trading, the balance directly determines the choice of scoring strategy. That trader's balance of 300U falls under the category of 'small to medium funds.' The core advantage of this scale of funds is 'flexibility,' while the core disadvantage is 'weak loss resistance,' which is also one of the key reasons why she didn't score after losing 45 points.
The frequency of scoring that 300U can support is very limited, and every transaction's fees and slippage must be carefully calculated. If she pushes hard on that day, assuming scoring 16 points requires completing 20 transactions, with each transaction fee being 0.1U, just the fees alone would require 2U. Adding the potential 1-2U loss from slippage, even if she earns 16 points that day, the actual capital loss would be 3-4U. More importantly, this 300U is her 'capital base' for future scoring and claiming airdrops. If too much capital is lost, even if there are good scoring opportunities later, there won't be funds to participate.
In contrast, large fund traders may have balances of over 1000U and a strong ability to absorb losses. Even if they lose 45 points, they can quickly make up the gap through large-scale point accumulation, or dilute transaction fee costs through high-frequency trading. However, for small and medium-sized funds, "preserving strength" is more important than "blindly making up points".
So, traders with a balance of 300U should remember: accumulating points is not about "more is better", but "accuracy is better". When facing days of heavy point deductions and insufficient returns, decisively stop, preserve your capital, and wait for a favorable score cycle with lower trading costs to act again, in order to survive in Alpha trading for the long term.@男神说币 #比特币流动性 $BTC
