✧ Liquidity is gradually disappearing from risk zones ✧ Spo | Crypto_Psychic on Binance Square

Trending Articles

Bookmarked and Liked

--

✧ Liquidity is gradually disappearing from risk zones
✧ Spot volumes are declining, activity is concentrated in derivatives
✧ The market survives on short-term moves
✧ The long-term horizon is no longer supported

Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.

BTC

88,098.91

-0.09%

0

0

Explore the latest crypto news

⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto

💬 Interact with your favorite creators

👍 Enjoy content that interests you

Email / Phone number

Relevant Creator

@Crypto_Psychic

Explore More From Creator

$TAO has lost a critical support level and is now trading deep inside a key demand zone. Price has broken down from prior structure and is currently hovering in the ~$200–$275 range, an area that has historically attracted buyers. That said, the broader picture remains fragile. Market structure is still decidedly bearish. Sellers continue to control momentum, and every short-term bounce so far has been met with renewed selling pressure rather than follow-through. This tells us that confidence hasn’t returned yet — rallies are being treated as exits, not entries. From here, the levels are clear: If the $200–$230 region holds, a short-term relief bounce is likely, driven more by positioning and oversold conditions than a true trend reversal. If $200 fails, downside risk opens up again, with the potential for another leg lower before any durable bottom can form. In short: this is a reaction zone, not a confirmation zone. Patience matters here — strength needs to be proven, not assumed. $TAO #TAO/USDT #TAO

--

Kite: Building a Blockchain for a World Where Execution Is

--

Falcon Finance: Why the Next Generation of DeFi Will Be Built Around Capital Discipline,

--

🚨 $50M Lost to an Address Poisoning Scam — A Costly Reminder A wallet labeled 0xcB80 has reportedly lost $50 million in USDT due to a subtle but devastating copy-paste mistake. Here’s how it happened: Before making the full transfer, the victim sent a small test transaction of 50 USDT to their own wallet — a common safety practice. Almost immediately, a scammer stepped in and created a spoofed address matching the same first and last four characters as the victim’s real address. This is known as an address poisoning attack. Because many wallet interfaces shorten addresses with “…” for readability, users often rely on checking only the beginning and ending characters. The attacker exploited this behavior. When the victim went back to send the remaining 49,999,950 USDT, they copied the address from their transaction history — unknowingly selecting the fake, poisoned address instead of their own. The result: $49,999,950 USDT was sent directly to the scammer. No exploit. No hack. Just a moment of misplaced trust in the UI. Key takeaway: Never rely solely on the first and last characters of an address Avoid copying addresses from transaction history Always verify the entire address before confirming large transfers A painful lesson — and an expensive one. Stay safe out there. $BTC

--

Lorenzo Protocol: Rebuilding On-Chain Money for an Era

--

Latest News

OpenAI and Microsoft Face Lawsuit Over ChatGPT's Role in Murder Case

--

GitHub Project Compromised by Malicious Code

--

Security Alert Issued Over Malicious Code in Polymarket Trading Bot

--

Sign Token Scheduled for Unlocking in December

--

Bitdeer Reports Decrease in Bitcoin Holdings

--

Cookie Preferences

Cookie Preferences