Recently, international news has been quite lively. There has been significant activity on the border between Thailand and Cambodia, with both sides claiming they want to combat online fraud. However, as they engage in this, it seems like things are getting a bit out of hand. As a result, China has announced it will send special envoys to mediate. From my perspective, this matter appears to be a dispute between the two countries, but at its core, it resembles the 'stability' we pursue—whether it's national development or the assets we hold, if there's no stability, everything is in vain.
Some people online say that Thailand feels Cambodia's casinos and online fraud operations are not being cleaned up sufficiently and wants to 'add fuel to the fire'; Cambodia, on the other hand, believes it can handle its own affairs. In this deadlock, the people living on the border suffer the most, and businesses cannot be conducted. This reminds me of the times when I was involved in the crypto market; the worst fear was this kind of 'uncertainty'. When project teams bicker, and the ecosystem is unstable, it's ultimately the users who pay the price. Therefore, whether between countries or projects, establishing trust and eliminating uncertainty is the hard truth. China's mediation this time may be crucial in helping both sides find a 'stability solution' that allows them to step down while genuinely solving the problem.
When it comes to stability and trust, I recently observed the stablecoin market and found that the @usddio project is also emphasizing similar logic. While USDT and USDC are fiercely competing, USDD is taking a slightly different route. It does not solely focus on scale but centers on 'transparency' and 'cross-chain stability', much like the verifiable and sustainable peace pursued in this international mediation. USDD builds trust through public reserves and high collateral, allowing people to verify its reliability at any time, which is especially important now. The topic of #USDD以稳见信 is quite relevant — reconciliation between countries needs to be evidenced by actions, and the value of a stablecoin ultimately relies on transparency of mechanisms and actual redemption capabilities. If the Thailand-Cambodia conflict can reach a transparent and enforceable anti-fraud plan under Chinese coordination, it would be a tremendous boon for the regional economy; likewise, in the highly volatile world of cryptocurrency, finding a stablecoin with a robust mechanism that does not play tricks is also a 'ballast' for the asset security of us ordinary users.
I think the chances of successful mediation by the Chinese side are quite high. Why? First, there is successful experience; previous cooperation in northern Myanmar has already proven the feasibility of the path. Second, it addresses the key pain points; the root of the conflict is telecom fraud, which is precisely an area where China can be deeply involved in finding solutions. Third, it provides tangible benefits to both sides; peace is established, trade channels are reopened, and China's investments and projects (such as railways and infrastructure) in both countries can be smoothly advanced, which is a substantial win-win for all.
In short, every corner of the world is pursuing 'stability'. Countries seek stable development, and we seek stable asset appreciation. When making choices, whether considering the international situation or selecting cryptocurrency projects like @usddio, it's better to look at the substantial support, long-term logic, and ability to solve practical problems behind them, rather than blindly following trends. After all, only when the foundation is stable can the buildings on top be solid, right?