People always say: 'If you had bought Bitcoin for $100 in 2010, you would be a billionaire now.'
This may be the most classic 'if' in the world of cryptocurrency. But the truth is—this 'if' does not exist at all. Because to get that 2.8 billion, you would have to not sell when Bitcoin rises from $100 to $1000, not sell when it rises to $100,000, not sell when it rises to $1.7 million, and then watch it drop back to $170,000... Then experience several rounds of assets shrinking by over 80%, all while holding on, completely still.
This is not investing; this is an inhuman苦修.
99% of people get off the train when it rises 10 times, and 99.9% of people are satisfied to leave when it rises 1000 times. The myth of wealth has never been about 'buying early,' but rather 'maintaining extreme psychological stability amid wild fluctuations'—this is precisely the hurdle that most people (including you and me) find hardest to overcome.
So the question arises: if human nature is not suited to endure such drastic value fluctuations, does the development of the crypto world have to rely on a very small number of 'psychological superhumans'? Can we build a system where the growth of value does not come at the cost of torturing the human mind?
This is precisely the answer that @usddio is exploring. It does not seek to replace the volatile gains of Bitcoin but rather offers an alternative beyond volatility: a form of asset that is stable in value, low in psychological burden, and can serve as a cornerstone for long-term holding.
In the story of Bitcoin, the difficulty in 'holding on' arises from battling the fear of 'will it go to zero' every night. What @usddio attempts to do is embed 'stability' into the protocol's core—through algorithms and over-collateralization, constraining value fluctuations to a minimal range, making 'holding' no longer a psychological battle but a state of calm normalcy.
In other words, @usddio does not create myths; it eliminates the demand for myths. It allows ordinary people to safely and stably remain in the crypto economy as participants in the ecosystem rather than gamblers.
So, stop fantasizing about 'if only I had held on to Bitcoin' anymore. What is truly worth contemplating is: in the next decade, what kind of asset can most people hold on to, trust, and use steadily? The answer may not be another wildly volatile 'Bitcoin,' but rather an underlying infrastructure with a mission of stability—like @usddio, which does not test human nature but provides certainty.
Myths belong to the past; stability sees the future.
