Trending Articles

Bookmarked and Liked

--

Over the last 7 hoursfive wallets deposited 8.84M $LIGHT (about $8.2M) into Bitget
$LIGHT had climbed from $1.35 to $4.75 over nearly three days
Then collapsed below $1 in under two hours
In the past 24 hours
liquidations in $LIGHT hit $16.17M
Second only to BTC and ETH

Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.

LIGHTUSDT

Perp

0.8577

-2.74%

BTC

87,852.79

-0.20%

ETH

2,958.39

-0.38%

0

0

Explore the latest crypto news

⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto

💬 Interact with your favorite creators

👍 Enjoy content that interests you

Email / Phone number

Relevant Creator

@bitbullnoah

Explore More From Creator

My scalping strategy in one picture I don’t predict direction I react to structure Range highs get faded Range lows get bought Small size Tight invalidation Quick exits Most trades last minutes not hours Scalping isn’t about being right It’s about surviving chop and stacking small wins $BTC

--

State of 2025 Token Launches a reality check (by Memento Research) Memento Research reviewed 118 token launches in 2025 and the data is brutal. Nearly 85% of tokens are trading below their TGE valuation. The median outcome since launch is -71% FDV and -67% market cap. Only 15% of launches are green. The rest are deep in the red. The most striking result: 28 projects launched at ≥ $1B FDV 0% of them are up today Median drawdown: -81% Big launches didn’t grow into their valuations they dragged the entire year down. That’s why the FDV-weighted index (-61.5%) looks far worse than the equal weighted one (-33.3%). Category breakdown shows more pain than promise: Infra & AI made up ~60% of launches and were punished hardest (-72% to -82% medians) DeFi quietly had the best hit rate (32% green) Perp DEXs stood out, but largely due to a single outlier Gaming, stablecoins, and DeSi offered little relief The clean takeaway is simple: TGE in 2025 was not early. For most projects, it marked the top. Lower-FDV launches were the only group with a meaningful survival rate, while higher starting valuations consistently led to deeper repricing. 2025 wasn’t just a bad year for alts. It was a valuation reset where hype lost to math, and size became a liability. #USGDPUpdate $AAVE

--

Waitlist open on Fast Protocol for early access. And important part Fast Protocol NFT mint is live It’s a Genesis SBT Free on Ethereum mainnet Only cost is gas around $0.018 Might be something Might be nothing But here’s what Fast is building Fast Protocol is trying to fix Ethereum UX Not by changing Ethereum But by changing how transactions are handled They use preconfirmations So when you send a tx, you get a signal in milliseconds No more guessing No more waiting Transactions go through an encrypted mempool Which reduces frontrunning and MEV abuse Instead of MEV being extracted Fast tries to tokenize execution rewards And distribute them across users and validators The Genesis SBT just proves you were early Minting it requires using Fast RPC And once you do You start earning Fast Miles from swaps and activity Built by the Primev team Backed by a16z CSX, HashKey, Figment Just Ethereum infrastructure experimenting in public Free SBT Cheap gas Waitlist open on the site Join their discord incase they have roles now there are around 4k members only $ETH

--

AAVE is entering a governance conflict that has been building for years Not because the protocol is weak But because it is stronger than ever This is not about a hack It is about control The protocol today Aave is the largest lending protocol in crypto Around $33B in TVL More than $21B in active borrows It is now more than twenty times larger than Compound That scale is what made the dispute unavoidable The trigger In early December 2025 CoWSwap was integrated directly into Aave Swap fees were routed to an Aave Labs wallet Not to the DAO That decision exposed a question that had been avoided Who actually owns AAVE The unresolved question One view The DAO funded everything through the ICO The brand and revenue should belong to token holders The other view Aave Labs legally owns the brand and IP And has carried development through years of risk This disagreement existed for a long time It just was not public Governance escalation A proposal emerges to move the brand and IP to the DAO Another proposal pushes the issue to a Snapshot vote The conflict becomes explicit DAO versus Aave Labs Arguments from one side • Fees should benefit token holders • Private control creates conflicts • DAO sovereignty must be protected Arguments from the other • Legal structures are complex • Snapshot voting is too blunt • Poor timing risks Aave V4 and adoption • Labs kept the protocol alive through earlier cycles Market reaction During the debate A large holder exits About 230000 AAVE Roughly $38M The capital rotates into stETH and WBTC AAVE trades near $151 What happens next? The Snapshot vote ends December 26 The protocol will survive either outcome What changes is governance Whether $AAVE becomes fully DAO controlled Or continues with hybrid power structures The open question is not if Aave endures It is what kind of protocol it becomes after this decision

--

APRO positioning itself as the #1 oracle deserves a closer look, beyond slogans. At its core, APRO is building an oracle layer optimized for real-time, high-frequency data, not just slow price feeds. This matters because the next wave of onchain activity isn’t simple spot swaps it’s perps, prediction markets, AI-driven apps, and event-based settlement, where stale data can cause liquidations or broken outcomes. Unlike legacy oracle models that focus mainly on coverage, APRO is leaning into speed, low latency, and multi-chain delivery. Their Oracle 3.0 design combines off-chain computation with on-chain verification, aiming to keep data accurate without bloating costs. Support for both push and pull data feeds makes it flexible for different applications. That said, “#1” isn’t about claims it’s about dependency. Chainlink still dominates integrations, but APRO is targeting a different battlefield: markets where milliseconds matter. The real test is adoption. If prediction markets and high-speed DeFi keep growing, oracles like APRO won’t be optional infrastructure they’ll be critical. Whether APRO captures that future will depend on usage, not narratives.$AT @APRO Oracle @APRO-ORACLE #APRO

--

Latest News

Trump Comments on Federal Reserve Chair Appointment

--

Atlanta Fed Projects 3% Growth for U.S. Fourth Quarter GDP

--

Upexi Files $1 Billion Shelf Registration with SEC

--

BitMine Acquires Additional Ethereum Through BitGo

--

White House Economic Advisor Criticizes Federal Reserve's Rate Decisions

--

Cookie Preferences

Cookie Preferences