Recently, there has been a repeatedly mentioned question in the community: "Why is it that despite the ongoing buyback and burn, the deflation model seems perfect, and yet the price still falls?"
This is a soul-searching question. It essentially asks: Are we investing in a mathematical model, or in a living narrative and consensus?
1. Deflation ≠ Immediate Price Increase The design of token economics, especially the buyback and burn mechanism, is a long-term value accumulation method. It is like quietly picking up a few grains of sand on a noisy beach every day. In the short term, the fluctuations of the tide (market sentiment, overall liquidity, external events) far outweigh the impact of these few grains of sand. $GIGGLE has chosen a more difficult path: it does not stimulate trading through inflation, but returns value to charity and long-term holders. This model requires time to counteract the gravity of the entire market.
2. What is CZ's recognition, and what does he recognize? What CZ brings to $Giggle is not a price guarantee. What he recognizes is the innovation of the community-built 'blockchain charity closed loop'—transforming the transaction tax of Meme coins into educational funding for Giggle Academy. This is a social experiment that shifts from 'pure speculation' to 'value generation.' His interaction serves to support the significance of this experiment, rather than endorse short-term price fluctuations. Some in the community express their feelings through Chinese poetry, and it is this cultural consensus that transcends price, taking root.
3. In the downturn, what is left behind? When the market is euphoric, all tokens seem the same; only when the tide recedes can we see who is swimming naked and who is still clothed. The clothing of $GIGGLE is its continuous record of charitable transfers, the gradually deepening interaction with the authorities, and the community's dedication to 'doing real things with cryptocurrency.' Price declines filter out speculators but often bring true believers to the surface.
---
And faith needs to be seen, value needs to be realized. This is why the narrative of $GIGGLE needs the complement of @Max Charity . $Giggle has completed the gathering and proof of charitable funds on-chain, while the @Max Charity community transforms these funds off-chain into tablets in the hands of children, installation guidance in rural classrooms, and each new real user**. One is responsible for building a credible 'wealth cycle,' while the other executes a solid 'growth cycle.' Only by combining both can CZ's vision of 'global free education' transition from a beautiful concept to a tangible reality.
In the crypto world, we often talk about 'narratives.' And the strongest narrative is when someone quietly turns a story into reality while you are questioning it.
