#Queimas

If the burns were really efficient, the circulating supply would have clearly dropped in 4 years.

In practice, what happens:

🔥 "Burns" that change nothing

They burn millions or billions, but the supply is trillions.

Percentage-wise this is irrelevant.

Often the burn is:

compensated by new emissions

or done just to generate news.

📉 Result:

➡️ the circulating supply hardly changes

➡️ the price does not react structurally.

📌 Why doesn't the price appreciate?

Because price depends on a simple equation:

📐 Price = Market Cap ÷ Supply

If: the supply doesn’t truly decrease

the market cap doesn’t grow much

👉 the price remains stuck or only experiences temporary pumps.

It’s exactly what we see:

it rises on hype

falls into silence

lateralizes for years.

📌 Specific cases (honest summary).

🐶 Babydoge

Huge burn in absolute numbers

Almost null in percentage

Inflationary token disguised as deflationary.

🌕 LUNC

Real burns exist

But:

the initial supply was absurd

weak ecosystem

Burn does not keep up with economic need.

🐕 FLOKI / 🐸 PEPE

Depend almost 100% on:

hype

community

Without strong utility, they cannot sustain price

👉 Burn does not create value on its own.

Real value comes from: ✔️ utility

✔️ organic demand

✔️ user growth

✔️ ecosystem revenue

Burn only works when:

it is high in percentage

it is continuous

it comes along with real use.

Historical example: BNB (burn + use).

📌 Mature (and true) conclusion

"If it were really working, we would already see the effect."

And we don’t see it.

These tokens:

are meant for short-term trading

not for passive appreciation expectations.