When it comes to 'network-type projects', many people's first reaction is: cold start hell.
No one uses it, so it has no value; without value, even fewer people will come.
Social, market, and platform-type products have all been repeatedly tormented by this question.
So when KITE, this 'Agent cooperation network', appears, skepticism is almost a reflex.
How can such a complex system get off the ground in the early stages?
But if you really break down KITE's growth logic, you'll find that its cold start is not that difficult.
In fact, on certain dimensions, they can be much easier than traditional human-oriented products.
There is only one key reason:
The KITE network is not initiated by 'more people', but by 'returns'.
In human social networks, value comes from the relationships themselves.
You need to have people first; then relationships have meaning.
But in the Agent world, the premise of relationships is not the number of people, but the tasks.
As long as there are tasks running, and as long as tasks can bring benefits, Agents will appear.
Not pulled in, but attracted in.
This is completely different from the new user acquisition logic we are familiar with.
No need to educate users, no need to cultivate habits, and no need to wait for emotional resonance.
Agents only do one thing: calculate accounts.
As long as on KITE, running more stably than other places, with clear settlements and low collaboration costs,
Agents have enough reason to connect.
This is also why KITE is not in a hurry to 'make a big plate'.
It is more like waiting for the first batch of truly useful tasks to appear.
Once these tasks exist, the network will grow naturally.
You can understand it as a kind of 'reverse cold start'.
It is not about filling users first and then finding scenarios;
Rather, it first runs through a few real scenarios before attracting Agents to come in.
The collaboration between Agents inherently has self-growing properties.
One Agent connecting can bring a task;
When a task is broken down, it will require multiple Agents;
When multiple Agents collaborate smoothly, a stable combination will form.
At this time, growth is no longer linear but structural.
Many people tend to compare KITE with traditional platform products, which is a common misconception.
Platforms need scale, while Agent networks need effective collaboration.
Ten Agents that can stably run tasks are far more valuable than ten thousand 'registered but unused' accounts.
From this perspective, KITE's cold start goal is actually very clear.
It does not need to become the 'largest' Agent network from the start,
Just need to become the **'best place to run tasks'**.
Once an Agent makes money on KITE or significantly reduces operating costs,
They will actively stay.
And as long as they stay, the relationship network will slowly take shape.
More importantly, Agents will not be swayed by emotions.
They do not need FOMO and will not leave due to short-term fluctuations.
Clear rules and stable returns are enough.
This is also why I feel that KITE's cold start is more realistic than you think.
It is not challenging human nature, but rather following 'efficiency'.
Of course, this does not mean there are no difficulties.
Any infrastructure takes time.
But at least in terms of growth logic, it stands in a relatively correct position.
When you really see a few tasks that 'run most smoothly on KITE' appear,
The cold start has actually been halfway completed.
The rest is just a matter of time.
